^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Serious About Improving? - Read This!

Submitted by ChessDweeb on Mon, 11/19/2007 at 7:12am.

I don't know about you, but I'm tired of getting pounded OTB. So I started searching for an answer. I have a great rating here at this site, but my over the board play is much less impressive. I can't seem to transfer my skills from this site to OTB play. I think this is my solution: NM Dan Heisman parlays chess success with mentoring/coaching. I believe this may be the missing element in my chess ability. I don't have a coach. For those of you that are good OTB, should I spend the time and money on a good coach? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!!!

Everything that follows is from NM Dan Heisman:

Why anyone wishing to improve needs a chess coach, and

Why anyone wishing to improve needs a chess coach: The fact is that no one ever got really good at chess without good chess coaching. This is true for almost any kind of endeavor - ever see Pete Sampras play without them showing you his coach…? Even Bobby Fischer, who liked to compare himself to the Russians by saying he did it all himself, actually went to NM John Collins’ home and studied with Collins and some of the best players in the country. Read any famous chess player’s biography and he will tell you how many years he spent studying at the Botvinnik School, or from IM Dvoretsky, or from Bruce Pandolfini, or whomever.

Chess is like anything else – to improve you need theory and practice. Theory may include reading books, watching videos, etc., but getting lessons is the key here, as it would be in sports (ever hear of a team without a coaching staff?) or music (a high school orchestra without a music teacher and instructor?), or anything else. In an upcoming Novice Nook I answer the question, “What can a good chess coach do for you that going over your game with (the chess program) Fritz cannot?” The answer:

A good instructor can:

1. Look at your games and see what you are doing wrong. Not just pointing out weak moves, but every possible weakness, such as misconceptions about how to play positions, planning and position errors, etc.
2. Talk with you and find out what you know and what you don’t. If you don’t know that both sides should try to attack when castling opposites sides with Queens on the board, he will see that and quickly tell you.
3. Answer questions and explain things to you that you don’t understand. Suppose you read in a book, “Passed pawns must be pushed” and you don’t know when or why, then if you ask a good instructor, he should be able to explain it to you until you are satisfied.
4. Work on your thought process. Listen to you think and make constructive suggestions on how to improve your technique.
5. Suggest a practice routine, including what tournaments to play, how to prepare, and what time limits would be the most helpful.
6. Suggest a way to learn new information and patterns, whether it be through reading books, watching videos, listening to tapes, etc.
7. Work on your time management. Show you when it is important to take your time and when you are wasting your time.
8. Provide psychological support. Teach you that you will not go straight up and that setbacks are normal and to be expected; teach you how to deal with and learn from your losses. Encourage you when you are down and keep you on an even keel if you get overconfident.
9. Help you pick an opening repertoire if you need help. Teach you what moves you will encounter the most frequently and the best ways to learn more.
10. Help you judge your progress and figure out what that means for your future play, practice, and study.
11. Show you themes and patterns that occur frequently so you know how to handle them when they do.
12. Listen to your concerns and desires and help you decide what are reasonable expectations; when you just need to accept what is happening and when you might need to do more.
There are more, but I think you get the idea!
Of course, not everyone can afford an instructor. Bad instructors can be gotten cheaply, but some bad ones are also pretty expensive. Most good instructors know they are good and charge at least a reasonable amount. I have had to raise my prices almost every year because I am always so busy, yet I still make less than half what I did 10 years ago as a software manager, and I get no benefits, so compared to a software consultant, most chess instructors are still dirt cheap! � - and you do not have to take a lesson every week.

» posted in ChessDweeb's Blog
 

Comments:

by ChessDweeb - 8 months ago
Sudburry Canada
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 638

DeepNf3, I think you are right. I may need some coaching to break the wall I've hit in my chess career. Since I don't aspire to be a titled OTB player I can also agree with Gladi8r that I shouldn't waste a lot of money on a coach. I'm interested to find out what Chessroshi's two year plan is too.

Thanks all!!! I will probably combine a small amount of coaching for critical area improvement with computer and book training.

by Chessroshi - 8 months ago
Indianapolis United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 178

I like to invest my money in books. For the cost of lessons, you can get high quality texts that will offer a lot of information, and often from Grandmasters if not World champions! You can check out the list of books I posted on this site for a good guide. As far as having someone analyze your games, I use Fritz. You'll have to use your brain to get better. One of the problems I've had in chess improvement is that I've wanted the magical answer that would make me a better chess player. The magical answer is hard work! Chess is like everything else in life, what you put in, you get out. I will be starting a 2 year chess program on Jan 1st 2008. If you would like any information on this, please send me a message and I can tell you about my plan.

Mr Mike

by DeepNf3 - 8 months ago
USA, FL United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1340
it is true that for some people to make improvement at something to get some coaching would be a good idea since some coaches not only have the knowledge but they are also good at employing the motivation factor in their teaching, motivation might be missing in some people, that being the reason why many people don't improve at certain things, but there are also those people who have so much motivation and interest for improving at what they like that a trainer, teacher or coach would be more of an annoyance to them than anything else, this was the case of Fischer who did not need a trainer at all, john W Collins was not Fischer's trainer at any point in Fischer's career, not even in his beginnings, John W collins trained William Lombardy and he might have trained Byrne at some point, John W collins wrote a book in which he claimed to have trained Fischer, Fischer's response to the book was to tell John W collins to stop saying that he had trained him, anyways I do believe that collins maybe deserves some credit for Fischer's glory, the reason I believe so is simple, Fischer was very close to Lombardy and it was Lombardy who coached Fischer for the 1972 match, I believe that the winning strategy used by Fischer in that match might had been a Lombardy idea, at the time Lombardy was among the very few top American players who sometimes played 1.c4 at the top level and 1.c4 was exactly the move which took Spassky out of his prep twice in the match giving Fischer two wins in his 3 first times to play white pieces, who knows if the whole idea of using 1.c4 in that match had come from John collins and made it to Fishcer through Lombardy.., we will never know for sure if that was the case..
by Gladi8r - 8 months ago
Portugal
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 3

It all goes down to the essential question: How serious are you over chess? I mean...do you really want to become great at it (FM, IM or GM) or your just aiming to something less ambitious (becoming fairly good)?

If your answer is the first, then you should have someone to guide you throught the process, and I won't definitely argue about that. Otherwise, I think that you can keep your money and make better use of it. Grabing some fine books and studying them will vastly improve your knowledge and you'll notice that. Just think about it...instead of paying 50$ for an hour you can buy a good book that you'll own forever and will provide you a lot more information than anyone can provide you on 1 hour.

 


by ChessDweeb - 8 months ago
Sudburry Canada
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 638
I don't know the reasonable amount. I do know that GMs in my region charge $50 usd hour and it goes down from there,
by XaVi3r - 8 months ago
chicago United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 29

"Bad instructors can be gotten cheaply, but some bad ones are also pretty expensive. Most good instructors know they are good and charge at least a reasonable amount."

What you think is "the resonable amount"?

by ChessDweeb - 8 months ago
Sudburry Canada
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 638
Great point. A coach can be an excellent introduction into the chess world.
by mary123 - 8 months ago
Brisbane Australia
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 41
Another benefit would be that the coach could introduce students to chess clubs/comps. Personally, I am too scared to just turn up...not just that I'm scared of making a fool of myself, but don't know anyone either. So many of chess players are introverts!
by ChessDweeb - 8 months ago
Sudburry Canada
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 638

Thanks willNZ. Appreciate the insight. : )

 

by WillNZ - 8 months ago
Wellington New Zealand
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 47

Definitely, but keep in mind that Chess coaching is not a be-all and end-all. However, it's highly recommended in anything really.

Coaching allows someone to emphasise your strengths and minimize your weaknesses. The more of this you can get, the better. Books tend to cater to everyone and a broad audience, whereas coaches won't waste time on things that are unimportant to your personal game. 

Books only offer generalisations, however someone who is experienced will be able to tell you the how and why of what to do/what not to do.

This is great, because then you learn a dynamic principle and that you can have a personal understanding with (which is much more effective than rote learning), rather than a static fact which is hard to apply out of context.

It's like, rather than giving the fish to the man, teaching the man how to fish... Tongue out

by ChessDweeb - 9 months ago
Sudburry Canada
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 638
I get that way sometimes. Thanks for the offer on a game but I'm cutting back for the holidays. I hate being put on vacation by others so I'm trying to finish up the rest of my games so I don't do that to other people.
by stevoonline - 9 months ago
Leeds, W Yorks United Kingdom
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 19
dude, that's long and I didn't read all of it.  What's your rating, do you want a game?
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.