Chess in a Time Warp

Submitted by Dozy on Wed, 06/18/2008 at 9:36am.

In Catch 22 when Joseph Heller wrote, “Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them,” he might have been looking at the way I play chess.

The other day I drew a low-rated opponent in a tournament and had a fairly easy time reaching the diagram position, a queen to the good.

I had just played 21.Rf7, stalemating the king and threatening 22.Qxa6+ Bxa6 23.Rd7#. At that point black blundered and placed his unprotected bishop on b7 allowing me to play 22.Rd7#.

 

And is that what I played? Not a chance! My mind was still locked into the queen sac on a6 to divert the bishop, which no longer needed to be diverted.

I'm not sure how wide-spread this problem is but other people have spoken about doing the same thing: you see a move or a combination then, when your opponent moves a day or two later, you go ahead and execute it—only to discover that the board no longer looks the way you remembered it. (It's analogous to a writer trying to proof read his own work: his subconscious tells his eyes what they should expect and they miss the errors.)

It's like playing chess in a time warp.

The obvious solution is make it a practice to play through the last few moves of each game to refresh the view of the board but, alas, like New Year resolutions that tends to get forgotten after a while.


» posted in Dozy's Inferno
 

Comments:

by Dozy - 21 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2238
by justwrightin: I am confused up there you said you drew with your opponent but in the diagram that you set up says you checkmated by sacking the queen and mating with the rook.

The use of "drew" in that context relates to "drawing" an opponent in a tournament.  (It is analogous to "drawing names from a hat" or "drawing the short straw".)

English is a funny old language.  I'm glad I grew up with it or I'd be in all kinds of trouble.

 


by justwrightin - 21 months ago
Redlands, CA United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 67
Well it looks more romantic to sac a queen even if it is unnecessary. Well if I played in that position I probably would have just gone for the kill missing that queen sac... so it was a great finish. Don't beat yourself up. That is not the game that shows mediocrity in my opinion. I am confused up there you said you drew with your opponent but in the diagram that you set up says you checkmated by sacking the queen and mating with the rook.
by emiab - 21 months ago
Romania
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 759

Your mouth speaks the truth. I felt that too. Now I know to be more carefull. Good idea to refresh the memory of the game by reviewing the last moves. BIG THANKS

 


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.