Fear and Panic

Submitted by Dozy on Thu, 06/05/2008 at 3:41pm.

Somebody once quipped that fear is the first time you can't do it the second time, and panic is the second time you can't do it the first time.

And the chess equivalent? For me, fear sets in when I'm a piece down without compensation against an experienced player and panic (also spelt r-e-s-i-g-n-s) sets in when I drop a second piece. Or, for that matter, have a lost end game against an opponent who has demonstrated his ability to win it.

Which reminds me of a lunch-hour game I watched on the Big Board in Sydney's Hyde Park, many years ago.

Not long after FM John Curtis—pictured in the grey suit—won the City of Sydney Championship he was playing one of the park regulars—a useful player but nowhere near John's class. The man lost a piece and, always a gentleman, John let him have the move again. A little later the same thing happened, and later on again.

So during the game John had given this guy three pieces back—equivalent to the odds of a three-piece handicap—and then, scrambling to finish the game before he had to return to work, he made an error and lost the game.

And what what the gracious response from his opponent? “You're not so good after all are you, Mr Champion. Who's the champion now?”

The poor man didn't realise he'd already lost the game three times and was only there due to John's generosity.


» posted in Dozy's Inferno
 

Comments:

by Dozy - 17 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2136

The psychological angle is interesting. As a fan of Peter O'Donnell's Modesty Blaise stories I remember reading about something he called PD—psychological domination. If you had the PD on somebody they couldn't beat you (he was talking about combat, not chess).

I am reminded about this every time I play Pistoleer. He has me so bamboozled that if he played 1.f3 I'd be tempted to resign. In one simple Italian Game he sacrificed a bishop on about move 4—an impossible thing to do and I settled in for an easy win. Hah! I wish! A dozen or so moves later I was down the gurgler again.

I've actually won a couple of games against Pistoleer but only when his creativity got the better of him and he crossed one bridge too far.

So I concur completely with your comment that asking for a move back concedes the psychological high ground. I have trouble enough beating people when we're looking at each other eye-to-eye.

And, yes, I'd love to hear about your chess sabbatical (sounds more like an epiphany).


by chessknot - 17 months ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 46

Hey Dozy... long time no speak!

I've been on a chess sabbatical (if there's such a thing), during which time I kinda sorted out some spiritual (vs intellectual) aspects of my life (if you're curious, I can share the story with you when we next meet) and logged on once in a while to keep in touch with the interesting stuff here, including your stories.

Well, I read yours tonight and couldn't resist posting my tuppence, esp after I had just played a game on freechess.org in which I allowed my opponent two take backs then declined a third... and he still blundered his queen!  It seemed that by asking for a takeback, he had lost the psychological battle!


by Dozy - 17 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2136

Nah, Justin, you're getting ahead of me.  The game can't continue beyond mate.  Each time the guy lost a piece and Curtis gave it back I counted that as a win to Curtis. 

Reminds me of something C.J.S.Purdy (1st World CC Champion) once said:  "If your opponent takes his moves back he is no better than a thug and you should refuse to play him."  (That's not an exact quote--I'm depending on  memory--but it's close.) 

Crikey, I could beat Anand if he gave me the move back every time I blundered. 


by justwrightin - 17 months ago
Redlands, CA United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 67
I am kinda confused. John Curtis had already checkmated the guy from the park but the guy did not realize it? and after the fact, the guy continued to play on and John allowed it until John eventually lost. Do I have it right? The story was a little confusing.
by Dozy - 17 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2136

One of my chess friends was a journalist with the ABC (Oz, not American) which was located right alongside the park.   He and I were watching the games one lunch time while, in turn, being watched by the flotilla of seagulls and pigeons you always find in Hyde Park.  I suppose it was inevitable sooner-or-later but one of them crapped on his head.

Well, everybody else thought it was funny!

(The same man left the ABC shortly after.  He'd been studying at night, got his PhD in Communication and scored an associate professorship at Bond University.) 

On another occasion, while I was thinking about my next move, my opponent left the board, ran like hell for about 60-70 metres, spun a guy around and dropped him with a lovely right haymaker.  Then he picked up the bag the guy had just stolen, walked back with it and finished the game.

It was an exciting place to play chess!  Lots of interesting people; lots of  interesting happenings.


by Pistoleer - 17 months ago
Ireland
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 479

Great story mate cheers fer sharing!

Ill not say what i really think of the eejit in yer tale ;)

Now..giant chess sets in public places... what a great idea. I wish there were more of them.. hmm wonder if i can persuade the local council to setup some locally... should be able to wangle some "peace and reconcilliation" funds fer it.. ;P


by Dozy - 17 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2136

You'd think it's a kid-type comment, Phil but it wasn't the case -- he was well into his 50s.  

At that time Hyde Park was a polyglot of multi-cultural chess, although it was never as popular a chess venue as NYC's Washington Square Park.  The standard was fairly high and there was a great deal of rapid-play chess, punctuated with pseudo-disparaging comments in best coffee house style.

The giant set held centre stage but was usually surrounded by a flotilla of individual chess boards.

When the council workers arrived to take away the major pieces at 1400 every day the whole chess scene migrated about 500 metres south to the chess tables near the Sydney War Memorial. 


by Phil_from_Blayney - 17 months ago
Blayney, NSW Australia
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 256

This can be a typical response from a kid. It isn't real nice coming from them let alone an allegedly grown up man!

I am sure John's response would have been a wry smile and the contentment that only one person there believed the comment :)


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.