Not Tonight, Josephine...er, Elisabeth

Submitted by Dozy on Tue, 06/24/2008 at 1:27pm.

One of the secrets of Napoleon's success was his unwavering attention to the task at hand. He certainly didn't allow external frip-frappery to distract him.

When he played chess against Madame de Remusat (Elisabeth le Michaud d'Arcon de Vaudey) at Malmaison Castle in 1804 she may well have considered mating on more than one level. Whatever was on the lady's mind, Napoleon found a most agreeable mate on the chess board.

And afterwards? Qui sait—who knows.

 


» posted in Dozy's Inferno
 

Comments:

by pleasures4life - 19 months ago
London United Kingdom
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 216

Not Tonite....

I wish i had such resilience, i on the other hand have lost upward 3 games because my fiancee was flirting and seeking attention while i was playing the last tournament. lol


by Dozy - 19 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2209

Great cartoon, and it points out one of the great differences between chess in the early 19th century and chess today:  they players came armed.

What would have happened at Gormallygate if Gormally and Aronian had been carrying swords?  Or at Toiletgate with Kramnik and Topalov?


by qtsii - 19 months ago
Machiavelli United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 4606

Here is a cartoon of Napoleon and Cornwallis I thought you would enjoy - maybe you could write about them.

 

 

 

 

Enjoy!

 

 

 


by qtsii - 19 months ago
Machiavelli United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 4606

Dozy quote:

Hi qtsii, Thanks for commenting.

And thanks also for your invite to join the chess history group, but the kind of research I've done into chess history may not be welcome there.

That is what the forums are for man - Iron sharpens iron. We all have mistakes in our information but we can all learn from one another besides I am the admin and you are good to go...


by Dozy - 19 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2209

Hi qtsii, Thanks for commenting.

And thanks also for your invite to join the chess history group, but the kind of research I've done into chess history may not be welcome there.

Vishy Anand's excellent article, The Indian Defence, on the origins of the game is plausable and supported by historical documents, but even he didn't go back far enough.  In fact, had he read the article I published on the Rooty Hill Chess Club web page a couple of Christmases ago, he would have realised that India was only second in the Great Game's journey to the 21st Century.

Don't believe me?  Then read this account of Die Gotterdammerung.


by qtsii - 19 months ago
Machiavelli United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 4606

Interesting you should joint the Chess History Group and post this.

 

http://www.chess.com/groups/home/chess-history

 


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.