A Positional Anti-Sicilian

Submitted by Grakovsky on Thu, 04/16/2009 at 2:51pm.

The Grand Prix Attack or also known by some as the McDonnell Attack is a strong anti-Sicilian opening. The Grand Prix Attack is most commonly started by 2.Nc3 first before going on with 3.f4. The modern main line continues 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.f4 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7. White can now play the positional 5.Bb5, threatening to double Black's pawns with Bxc6, or the more aggressive 5.Bc4, aiming for a kingside attack. A less common option is 2... e6, as La Bourdonnais played against McDonnell.

This is exactly what the chess program, Crafty, played against me after my early pawn push to f4, as shown in the game presented below. We traded off queens rather early and our positions seemed fairly equal before I started blundering. The most notable blunder from this game was 45.Rc3 which allowed my opponent to pin my rook. Now I was playing against a computer with my lonely knight against his overruling rook - obviously no more winning chances. Several moves later I resigned. I played with the White pieces.

» posted in Grakovsky's Blog
 

Comments:

by Narz - 7 months ago
Pitman, New Jersey United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2798

I consider 2. f4 rather weak.  I play a direct 2. ... d5 against it.  2. Nc3 is the usual Grand Prix move where black has a long battle ahead of him.

by Catalyst_Kh - 7 months ago
Kharkov Ukraine
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 1014

helter_skelter - what you said is incorrect. Computer is much stronger when there is a lot of pieces, when it is tactical play, while after exchanges and in endgame many engines are a lot weaker. Also it is MUCH easier for human to calculate moves when less pieces, not for computer as you claimed.

 

ih8sens - very nice line for white! I played 2...d5 twice in my life and get interesting midlegames after 3.exd5, but if white would play as you said i would be totally confused. Now i will study that lines too, thank you.

by ih8sens - 7 months ago
Sudbury, Ontario Canada
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2804

The nature of the Grand Prix theory is slowly changing from a positional one to a highly tactical one.  Thanks to Tal (of course) and his gambit... as addiction_to_chess so nicely posted about two spaces under mine...

 

An interesting try is 1. e4 c5 2. f4 d5! 3. Nf3!? dxe4 4. Ng5 Nf6 5. Bc4 ... black must now either give white free play (albiet only equality) with 5. ... e6 or risk it all with 5. ... Bg4!? (the continuation being Qxg4!? where white gets incredible play but black gets a queen!).

by helter_skelter - 7 months ago
Delhi/Kolkata India
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 2

Why were you trying to simplify so much against a computer, where it 'd be easier for him to do the calculations.

by addiction_to_chess - 7 months ago
Metro Manila Philippines
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 358

The Grand Prix Attack works great as a surprise weapon and lower levels or sometimes even A-Class but against better opposition, it fails if you're opponent would know 2...d5! (The Tal gambit, with the intention of 3.exd5 Nf6! 4.c4 e6 gambiting a pawn for free piece play and a target d-pawn plus that gaping hole in d4.)

by EnterTheDragon - 7 months ago
St. Stephen, NB Canada
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 86

Nice positional battle with the computer up until the end.

Did you consider 9.Kxe2 ?  The reason I ask is because I think Kxe2, Re1, Kf1 would be more efficient than Nxe2, O-O, Re1, Nc3.  One move more efficient actually.  Also your king would be safe on f1 since Black's light square B is gone and it would be a move closer to the center for later.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.