To the lower rated players
Submitted by
on Sat, 10/10/2009 at 12:42am.
To the lower rated players
Is chess a waste of time? A waste of money? A waste of hope chasing a black cat in a dark room. A waste of love? I am not talking about little children with little ratings who have developed a likeness of the game. The ones chock full of potential. I speak of the old people or relatively young teens that show no natural talent for the game and can only be good if they study like a trained dog. Basically imitating grandmaster moves and will probably never contribute a combination or game that will be reflected in awe many years from now. Is our desire to be like the chess giants blinding us? Is it better to save $200 entree fee. $100 hotel rooms. $1000 chess education (teachers, books, software) for something else? I love this game. More than anything in the world. I neglect everything in study to hope I will someday have an article on chess.com or something with a key move in analysis and have people say "Play like Justin" or something. I have been playing this game and studying it since 4 years old yet here I stand 13 years from when I first learned to move the pieces as a 17 year old approaching 1400. Being surpassed by young chess prodigies. People like Fischer, Tal, Kasparov, Speilmen, Waitzkins, Alekhine, Christensen, Topalov, Morphy, Anand, Keres, and the rest worth mentioning players inspired me. I play chess for 6 hours a day or so and study for 3. It seems I am going no where fast.