Perpetual Check

Submitted by Loomis on Sat, 01/24/2009 at 11:51am.

Every so often we'll see a forum topic here at chess.com along the lines of "hey, my opponent won't stop checking me so that I can finish beating him." The poster seems to think this is unfair, that he's being denied his right to win by a player who simply won't man up and take their loss.  Unfortunately for the original poster, they are learning a harsh lesson -- If you can't protect your king, you're not winning.

 

Here's an example from a recent tournament game of mine. I was doing well in this game, but we were both getting in to time trouble near the end of the G/60 time control. My opponent was doing his best at counterplay against the h2 square and I nearly slipped up and allowed a perpetual:


Both players need to keep constant care of their king. If you're winning, safety first! And if you're trying to salvage a draw from a worse position, look out for the possibility of attacking the opponent's king. Being caught by perpetual check isn't unfair, it's called being outplayed.

» posted in Loomis's Blog
 

Comments:

by Dozy - 9 months ago
Blue Mountains Australia
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2098

Reminds me of a game I played in the NSW Open in 2007.  I was a rook up and allowed a perpetual ... and my opponent apologised for playing on when he "should have resigned".  He's a really nice guy!

Welcome back, Loomis.

by kissinger - 9 months ago
seattle United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 448

Sometimes life is just like one big "perpetual check", but maybe that's just me, LOL.

by Ziryab - 9 months ago
Spokane, Washington United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 1248

Today's games in Wijk aan Zee had another example that you should look at: Kamsky - Stillwagen. Now, I'll look at your example.

 

Nice king manuever in your game. Too bad that Kamsky lacked that resource. Wink

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.