Weak white/black squares

Submitted by Loomis on Thu, 06/12/2008 at 5:32am.

I notice that good players often point out that a position will have weak white or black squares. I understand this a little bit, but I still have questions as to how we know there is a weakness and more importantly when and how can this weakness be exploited. I wish I could say I have the answers to these questions, but I'm pretty certain that it comces down to each position being unique. Sometimes the weak color can be used  and sometimes it can't and the specific way it can be used depends on the other weaknesses in the position.

 

The best I can do is annotate some examples from my own games where a weak color was utilized to win the game. 

 In the first example, white gives up the light squared bishop early in the game and later weak white squares become jumping off points for black's pieces.

 

In the second example, black has given up his kingside fianchetto and a mating attack is delivered simply on the basis of the weak dark squares around the king.

 

 

The third example is also a mating attack on the dark squares where the fianchettoed bishop has been eliminated. This time we'll look at the whole game:

 

 


» posted in Loomis's Blog
 

Comments:

by oginschile - 5 months ago
Salt Lake City, UT United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 992

Likesforests - Thank you... that book has been on my must read list for too long. I've been told I can't be too serious about my chess if i haven't read it.

Loomis - I suppose it's possible, but i never would be. It was a good position for the topic you were discussing. This was a great post.


by likesforests - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 3314

I think there are some guidelines we can use:

  1. If our opponent has an unopposed good bishop, it's likely we'll have weak pawns or weak squares.
  2. If we have bishops of opposite colours, it's almost as certainty we'll have weak pawns or weak squares.

This is a snippet from a blitz game I played yesterday.

Black's attack on my light squares didn't gain any material, but clearly my light squares were weak and he has used that to gain more active positions for most of his pieces. White's position is sour, even a pawn up.

 


by Loomis - 5 months ago
Durham, NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2273
I always wonder if someone will recognize their game in my blog. I sure hope no one is offended if they see their game here.
by likesforests - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 3314

oginschile > Thats great in theory if I had a clue what to do with e5!!

In "My System", Nimzowitsch spends a whole chapter on what to do with a pawn on e5 in the French Advance. He disagreed with the commonly held belief--then and now--that such a move releases all the tension. There is hope for us, because in the same chapter he publishes a letter by Alapin who was adamant that a pawn on e5 did next to nothing for White and was in fact a mistake. Nimzowitsch's record in the French Advance is +12, =3, -0 so he must have had a better grasp than most on the ideas behind it. 


by oginschile - 5 months ago
Salt Lake City, UT United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 992

Hey that second puzzle looks like a bad dream... if i didn't know where it came from. haha.. glad I could contribute to your excellent blog.

Light and dark squares is a topic I want to spend serious study on some time... the same with "weak squares"... or often in analysys grandmasters will say "key squares". What in the world makes it key? I remember Yasser Seirawan saying (the oft repeated) control e5 and all good things will flow.

Thats great in theory if I had a clue what to do with e5!!

I know how the pieces move, I can even use them in combination to attack... but the more i learn the more i realize there is a consciousness to the game that I will probably never quite grasp.


by Loomis - 5 months ago
Durham, NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2273
Thanks, I'm glad you are finding the blog useful.
by PerfectGent - 5 months ago
St Andrews Scotland
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 978
as always loomis very educational - thank you
by exiledcanuck - 5 months ago
Wellington New Zealand
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 304
Good Blog!  I'll come back to view this again when not so tired!  I think I learned something.
 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.