King's Gambit Accepted- 3... g5

Submitted by Nytik on Fri, 06/12/2009 at 7:06am.

So, you're the sort of player who likes to play gambits, huh? Sacrificing a small (sometimes large!) amount of material to get the initiative and so, hopefully, win more material than you gave to the opponent. These days, computer analysis has refuted many of the swash-buckling gambits of the past, but a few remain where with correct play the opponent should not be able to do much more than equalise.

So, in this vein, we today look at the King's Gambit. Obviously not the whole thing- books can be written on such a topic! No, instead, we focus our minds to the line 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5. Just 6 plys in, there are plenty of crossroads to be met and variations to be explored. So lets hop to it!

 

Before we look into these lines, what is the position like at the moment? As we can see, white has his claim in the centre, via e4, and his Nf3 is making it's mark on those squares the pawn doesn't assist with. On black's side of things, his latest move, g5, defends his f4 pawn and makes an important kingside stake. So, how do we play on?

Kieseritzky Variation

The Kieseritzky is probably what most King's Gambit-ers would refer to as the main line of the 'accepted' trail of thought. White plays to dismantle the newly fortified black pawn-outpost on the kingside. Meanwhile, black drums up threats while directing his forces to this area.

 


Philidor Variation

The Philidor has vital differences to the Kieseritzky, which will completely alter the structure of the opening phase. This time, white decides to develop a little before striking out and g5- however, this gives black time to organise a defence, and therefore black has some nasty intrusions on white's space.

Hanstein Variation
The Hanstein is an interesting offshoot from the Philidor Variation. This time, white refrains from ever playing h4 at all! Instead, he pushes forward on the queenside, and develops his pieces. Black also hops onto the development bandwagon, in this much quieter line of the gambit.

Muzio Variation
The Muzio Gambit (or, in this blog, Variation) has a bit of a reputation- it's just unclear what that reputation is. Many people will suggest that sacrificing a knight so early in the game simply does not work (decide for yourself whether the Fried Liver Attack supports or opposes this argument) and this gambit is anything but sound. White's idea is to put all his pieces in active, attacking positions, before black has time to bring in defensive resources, and so, win the material back and hopefully even more!

Conclusion
As we have seen, even if we look at a specific version of the King's Gambit, the Accepted Variation, 3... g5 Variations, there is much to learn and much to explore! The lines shown on these pages do not even cover all of the theory on these lines- there are deviations and crossroads all over the place; I have endeavoured to mention as many of the main ones as possible, so as to allow your own development.
Perhaps the King's Gambit is for you- however, if you plan on playing it, remember not all of your opponents will reply with 2... exf4 and 3... g5! There are many other lines that are just as good for black, and any pioneer of this attack must be prepared.

Whether you will start a new career with this opening, or think it's a pile of trash, I hope you enjoyed the blog either way. Remember to look out for later editions of similar posts on other openings- I'm sure there will be more.
But in the meantime, Happy Gambit-ing!

 

Comments:

by Elubas - 2 months ago
Buffalo United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 2158

Black allowed white to win the pawn back.

by Nytik - 2 months ago
Southampton United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 4388

Unfortunately, Elubas, only one game can really answer that question, and you may not like it, but here it is anyway:

http://www.chess.com/games/view.html?id=786422#

by Elubas - 3 months ago
Buffalo United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 2158

Nytik, in the final position of the kiesertizky gambit could you tell me white's compensation for the pawn? Black is not behind in development, and can take the dark squares with ...Bg7. How does white continue his initiative? In fact, to be perfectly honest, does it not look like black's pieces are more active here or is it just me? And white's kingside is just as weak as black's.

by Nytik - 4 months ago
Southampton United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 4388

I aim to please, batgirl.

by batgirl - 4 months ago
NC United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 4313

The fact that White can't get any real advantage, making the game drawish in nature, coupled with the uncertainty and surprise potential of such open games, the KG has been somewhat dead in high level chess.  This, of course, does not mean that Black has any advantage and certainly not that the gambit is unsound, but simply that theory pretty much caught up with it. Like most openings, it really comes down to who plays the strongest and with the fewest errors in each specific game.  The KG, like most gambits, remains one of the most fun openings to play, and as with most gambits, has the aesthetic appeal of counterbalancing different types of advantages, such as time vs material.

This was a very enjoyable overview of some of the main variations in the g5  line.

Thanks.

by Nytik - 4 months ago
Southampton United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 4388
PavleKosic, here I attempted to show that at best black can only get equality. I am unsure about the declined lines, however.
by PavleKosic - 4 months ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 212

preety good blog....I like KG and I study it a lot, it can be destructive against weak oponents, but if black play corectly in my thougt he would be much better.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.