Smashing the Scandinavian

Submitted by Phobetor on Mon, 01/05/2009 at 12:22pm.

For almost two years I played the Scandinavian (1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5) as black, which taught me two important things. Not only did I learn how to play the opening best as black and what the plans and strategies are for black, but also did I learn how white can give black a very hard time equalising, and how white should play the opening. Losing games as black did not only teach me what can go wrong for black, but also how white can win, even against prepared Scandinavian players!

After getting some bad results against prepared opponents, I stopped playing the Scandinavian a while ago. The only times I play Scandinavian games now are when I am white and my opponent plays 1... d5. Yesterday was another of those games. One of the variations I hated the most in the period I played the Scandinavian was when white delays the move Ng1-f3, but first develops the rest with Nc3, d4, Bc4, Bd2, Qe2. This gives white one crucial tempo, which allows him to play d4-d5, while with the moves Nf3 and ...Bb4 included, this would not be possible.

In the game this also lead to a critical position for black. White manages to open the center early, while black is neither developed nor castled. Black had to be very careful all of his moves, and while he played the best moves most of the game, he made one small mistake around move 20, which gave me a winning position right away.

Below is the game with annotations.

» posted in Phobetor's Blog
 

Comments:

by djw777 - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 78

Already explained...  (I like ...Nf6)   "Theory" (Taylor, Harding) says the later White playes d4 the better.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1108

djw777, then what do you think does lead to a better game for black after 4. d4? You said 4. d4 is a mistake, but why is it a mistake?

by djw777 - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 78
 Phobetor  wrote - "So you consider 4... e5 the refutation of 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4? Theory as I know it says 5. dxe5 is good for white, and after 5... Nc6 play 6. Nf3. Still, can't you answer my question? Do you have a source saying 4. d4 e5 is good for black? Or do you have a strong novelty that refutes the "refutation" of the Anderssen Counter Gambit?"

 

Ummm... I did say 4...e5 was "cooked."  It's an American expression we use to mean "busted."  (Meaning "bad" or "unplayable.")  Sorry for the misunderstanding.  Even in bad lines, White's win is not that easy and a slight mistake puts White in serious trouble.  (That's why I chose that game.)

 

You recommended the Matachkarov Variation (...Nc6), championed by Rolf Schwarz and Ken Smith, which leads to equality.  I have not had much success with ...Nc6.  Black has two other moves to choose from: mainly ...Qxe5 and ...Bb4 (the point behind ...e5 and probably the main line).

 

Anyway, I owe you a debt of gratitute.  Keep up the crusade.  Anything and everything to keep the Scandinavian in the shadows is fine by me!  The fewer people who understand its bite, the better off it is.

 

BTW, GM Kaidanov (an openings expert) recommeds the Scandinavian becuse it does not leave the Dark Side with any weaknesses.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1108

So you consider 4... e5 the refutation of 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4? Theory as I know it says 5. dxe5 is good for white, and after 5... Nc6 play 6. Nf3.

Still, can't you answer my question? Do you have a source saying 4. d4 e5 is good for black? Or do you have a strong novelty that refutes the "refutation" of the Anderssen Counter Gambit?

by djw777 - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 78

"You probably have never faced good players playing the white side of the Scandinavian then..." [Phobetor]

 

Yes, many... Here's an example against a 2300 player... enjoy.

 

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1108

djw777, you're not answering my question. You're saying d4 is considered a mistake by the latest theory, so I ask you: What latest theory? Who says d4 is bad?

I know the Scandinavian main lines certainly do not favor black, so unless you can give me a very good reason to believe you, your comment that d4 is bad is worthless and meaningless to me.

by djw777 - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 78

Phobetor... you said that 11...Nc6 was better but you did not believe in Black's position.  How would your proceed as White?  What are the weaknesses in Black's position?

 

17...Qc7 "equalizes" for Black.  Actually, White's pawn structure is in ruins... which gives Black a huge endgame advantage.

 

Yes... 22...Nf7 is a serious mistake... but yo have to admit, it is tempting OTB to "fork" the Rook and Bishop.

 

Nice finish.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1108

djw777, I'm not sure if we're living in the same world. Could you give me ANY credible sources that say an early d4 is a mistake?

by djw777 - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 78

Phobetor  Yes, an early d4 is considered a mistake by the latest theory.  If you are up for a game, I'll show you.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1108

Wow, djw777, you're being way too optimistic there. "4. d4 is a mistake"? "The longer White holds off playing d4 the better the chance of survive."? If black can get equality in the Scandinavian he's happy, but you're saying white will not survive if he plays 4. d4? You probably have never faced good players playing the white side of the Scandinavian then...

by djw777 - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 78

I've played the Center Counter for a very long time.  Let me play the othe side of the fence.... 1. e4 d5 2. ed Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4 Nf6 5. Bc4 Bg4 is much better for Black...

 

Typically the response to 4. d4 is ...Nf6 (assuming Black wants to survive).  If you want a wild game, try 4...e5.

 

My experience leads me to believe that 4. d4 is a mistake.  The longer White holds off playing d4 the better the chance of survive.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1108

@ howlieboy69: If you're only interested in getting people to look at your game, don't post here please.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
International
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1108

@ hicetnunc: Thank you! Well, a while ago, when I started annotating these games, I was doubting where I should post it (Articles or Blog). Eventually I decided it's more about my chess life than general chess content, so I decided to put such games and comments in my blog.

Part of this entry is more general chess content though (advice on a white Scandinavian system). Maybe I can make an article from that some time.

by hicetnunc - 5 months ago
Neuilly-sur-Seine France
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2429

Wonderful comments and highlights on a very interesting white system. It would deserve an article !

5 stars Cool

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.