^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Steinitz vs “Allies” - 1892

Submitted by RookHouse on Mon, 05/05/2008 at 6:13am.

 John Finan Barry was a great American chess player from Boston, who once challenged Jackson W. Showalter for the U.S. Championship (losing -7 +2 =4) in 1896.  Mr. Barry was also an excellent chess columnist and a true ambassador to the game of chess.  He additionally represented the United States in many of the famous cable matches against Great Britain from 1896-1901, compiling an impressive record of 5 wins, 0 losses, and 1 draw.

In September of 1917, Barry had an article published in British Chess Magazine.  The article was in response to BCM’s April edition of the same year, in which they talked about Mr. Franklin K. Young’s “Major Tactics of Chess”.   Barry wrote in to display the differences in his belief of chess fundamentals, as opposed to the afore mentioned author’s writings.

Barry included a game in his notes to BCM that took place on the event of Wilhelm Steinitz’s last visit to Boston in 1892.  It was a consultation game in which Barry refers to himself, Harry Nelson Pillsbury, and Mr. S. B. Snow as the “Allies”.  Their opponent was then world champion Steinitz, who was playing by himself.  Barry refers to this particular game as one of the finest illustrations for fundamentals that he had ever seen, stressing the minor right formation versus stategic counter-attack.

We present this rare game to you as seen below, complete with Mr. Barry’s commentary.  Steinitz had the White pieces and the “Allies” had the Black pieces.

SOURCE: British Chess Magazine, September, 1917


» posted in RookHouse's Blog
 

Comments:

by NinjaBear - 2 months ago
Salt Lake City (USA) China
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 245
21... Rd2!
by mueller - 2 months ago
Hardcorvallis United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 69

in the old school notation chesser, each player's coordinates are unique to their own side. Such as Qkt3, would be b3, or b6 depending on which player wrote that.

Or Kr5 would be h4/h5 depending on who wrote it. the Q/K says whether it is kingside or queenside, and then the r/kt/b says whether it is knight rook or bishop, etc. It is a little confusing, at first, and 

I am a fan of algebraic notation over this ,but if you buy any old chess text it

 will be like this so it is good to know. 


by RookHouse - 2 months ago
Ohio United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 78

Sorry, I thought I got all of them.  The game was in English Descriptive notation.  An example of one I missed is P-Q4 (pawn to Queen 4).  For White, this would be d4 and for Black, it would be d5.

 Here is a link that explains the English Descriptive notation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descriptive_chess_notation

 

--Kevin


by Chesser777 - 2 months ago
Belgium
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 337

In some comments you didnt "translated" the notation.

I dont understand his way of notation... 


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.