Paul Morphy, the "Pride and Sorrow" of chess, gives us another outstanding performance in this game played in 1858. Al Horowitz considers this game in his "Golden Treasury of Chess" as "The most brilliant of Morphy"s masterpieces". For all you Morphy-lovers, enjoy.
This is a strange, magical and controversial game. Morphy's Rook sac on move 17 has been a source of argument since Steinitz. Some people maintain that it was basically a blunder since best play by White leads to a draw, whereas prior to the sac Black is thought to have a winning position as well as a pawn to the good (such a given winning line is 17...Bg4! 18. Rdg1 Bf3 19. Bxf3 Qxf3!). Other's claim Morphy was more concerned about the sacs' aesthetic quality, and relied on his self-confidence to be able to out-navigate his highly skilled opponent, the ever-tricky Bird.
Lol either morphy was reallly great. or bird was really bad. i think a little of both.
I wonder how high Bird jumped in his chair when he saw the move 17...Rf2?
It must have been a complete surprise for him!
Kamalakanta
NICE Game!!!
ADK
Mikhail Tal is my favorite tactical player. But seeing this gem by Paul Morphy made me realize that the former champion Tal is a lighter version of Paul Morphy, tactically.
For the overall facets of the game, Paul Morphy is simply the best chess player ever lived.
Another great Morphy game! I think he was one of the most original "thinkers" in chess, teaching the rest of the world how to play. He always went quickly for the throat! What impressed me so much was his blindfold playing ability and his ability to find incredible moves very quickly. He rarely took over a couple of minutes (or seconds) for each move. He could quickly see deeply into a series of exchanges and sacrifices to a winning mating net. Too Bad it ended so badly for him. He is my favorite! Great topic, Great Genius, Great Man of Chess!
Good use of controlling the centre and strong tactics!
If Morphy would have returned in chess, he would have defeated everybody - with the greatest ease.
This was Fischer's opinion. I agree with him. István Bilek Hungarian grandmaster described this sentence in the Preface of my Morphy book. We were analizing this game together and we were of the same opinion that this is the most beautiful game of Morphy. The analysis was eight A/4 pages. In the game we found winning continuations where before it wasn't known. Only the 22th move... If Bird would have moved 22.Kc1! thus the game is draw, but he moved 22.Kb2? Still one defective Bird move: 6.Ng3? instead of 6.Nxe5!
Kenytiger made again a good choice! Later such a beautiful game nobody could choice!
Incredible. Stunning actually. Morphy was way ahead of his time. I wonder what he would have done in chess with today's resources?
Thanks for the post. Once again, an excellent one from kenytiger.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
Share your chess knowledge with the community!
Submit an article