Ratings

Submitted by chawil on Mon, 12/01/2008 at 4:26pm.

Someone recently achieved a 1200 rating playing against Fritz and posted a thread asking what that means. I wrote a (rather long) reply but, since this subject crops up occasionally, I thought I'd post it here as well. I hope it will be of interest to community as a whole or at least to those who don't understand the rating system.

Ratings in the USCF, at least about 20 years ago, went something like this:

  • 1200-1399 = 'D' player - usually a beginner;
  • 1400-1599 = 'C' player - average club or tournament player, most people can achieve this level if they work at it;
  •  1600 - 1799 = 'B' player - consistently above average;
  • 1800-1999 = 'A' player - strong club player, takes the game far too seriously!, has lots of opening knowledge;
  • 2000-2199 = 'Expert' - extremely strong, consistent player with the possibility of achieving Master rating, may have real talent;
  •  2200-2399 = 'Master' - strongest amateur rank, hasn't quite got the hang of things yet but maybe one day he/she will wake up.

International professional players have two ranks:

  • 2400-2499 = 'International Master' - weakest professional rank; strong, experienced international player, eats Masters for breakfast;
  • 2500+ = 'Grandmaster' - eats IMs for breakfast, lunch and dinner, a star in the firmament of Caissa, a chess genius who thinks nothing of playing 20 and 30 board simuls against Experts and Masters and is disappointed if he/she doesn't win every game, capable of playing 10-20 blindfold games at the same time, and winning, etc. etc, in short, an all around bricks and mortar, brass bound b*st*rd of a player, but they do lose on occasion, sometimes to players with a much lower rating and computers are better than that these days.

Note that IMs can be rated above 2500 if they haven't yet achieved the results necessary for the title of Grandmaster.

As you can see, most of us have got a long way to go!

The ranks of International Master and Grandmaster can only be gained through participation in international tournaments and the achievement of 'norms', that is consistently drawing with and beating other professional players. You can get a rating of 350,000,000 by playing in local tournaments but you still wouldn't be an IM or a GM. Of course if you do get a rating of 350,000,000 drop me a line and tell me how you did it!

It's important to remember that a rating is a measure of consistency so don't be put off playing higher rated players. Anybody under the rating of 2000 can play like an absolute idiot in a particular game and you'll find that you will sometimes play far beyond your own rating.

The great thing about chess is that it's fun to play. Players rated 1200 and below probably have a lot more fun playing than professionals. I think it was Gary Kasparov who said, "Chess is mental torture!", which doesn't sound to me like he's enjoying his games very much. After all, chess is a pass-time and, unless you're trying to be a professional, treat it as such and don't worry too much about your rating.

» posted in For Beginners
 

Comments:

by styxtwo - 11 days ago
New York City Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 14

soo online chess ratings are inflated... 

what does it mean whan you have a chess.com rating of around 1000 xD

man i must be stupid :P

by plane129 - 15 days ago
ca United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 306

Must get more points!

by SkyChess - 29 days ago
Somewhere in Singapore
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 86

This is a very illuminating blog. Thanks for putting it Chawil!

by matzleeach - 30 days ago
Chicago IL United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 632

great post!

by chawil - 36 days ago
Lowestoft, Suffolk United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 373

"FIDE ratings are inflated too."

Let me give you a timely example. There is a player called 'ChessNetwork' who has a National Master rating, which means that he's a solid 2400 player who, for one reason or another, can't manage to get his IM norms. His rating on Chess.com is over 2900, at least 500 points above his 'live' rating. This disparity is because he's one of the few strong players using Chess.com Live Chess, for most of us the rating disparity is roughly 200-300 points. Again this is because most serious players, note that there are serious 1200 players too, don't play over the net, or, if they do, they use the ICC, which is a commercial site where you must pay to play.

by chawil - 37 days ago
Lowestoft, Suffolk United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 373

menof sticks wrote "I have read in the forums that the ratings on Chess.com are inflated by about 200 points when compared to "real" pools of chess players". This is probably from a comment I posted some time ago. The reason for the difference is that internet chess is seen as irrelevent by many serious players. I know the net is international but you are missing the top 'layer' of the cake. Most serious players would rather spend their time preparing for and playing live tournament chess, whatever their rating. So the rating you get here probably will not reflect your results in live tournament play.

Having said that, don't worry about it. Chess is for fun. As to which books you should read, well you'll soon find that out for yourself. Chess books are like any other books, read the ones you enjoy or that you find helpful. If you haven't much experience I recommend Euwe's "Chess Master Vs Chess Amateur" and, if you're new to the game, an endgame manual of some description with particular attention to pawnless endings, e.g. queen vs rook, mate with bishop and knight, that sort of thing. It's no use getting a material advantage if you don't know how to win with it. A survey of the openings is helpful as well.

by menofsticks - 37 days ago
Canada
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 135

I have read in the forums that the ratings on Chess.com are inflated by about 200 points when compared to "real" pools of chess players, such as FIDE and USCF.  This makes a certain amount of sense if you consider that Chess.com and other internet chess systems include a lot of folks that aren't as serious as most club players.  However, I don't know where the 200 bit comes from or if it is even accurate.  If anyone can elucidate this issue, please jump in.

There isn't any organized chess in my town so I'm curious, particularly because an accurate rating would help in deciding what to study, which books to buy, and so on.

by Astrocloud - 37 days ago
Massachusetts United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 20

So much cannibalism in the world of chess.

by jessie36 - 37 days ago
London United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 8

Thanks for clearing that up mate! Much appreciated.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.