if ur live rating iz more than 400- than ur online rating, chess.com have 2 thing bout that thing nd check u out

what in the world are you talking about? you make no sense...read the blog again. I don't think if someone is higher rated they're cheating. where did you read that?

yes prove it u can write to chess com to invesigate me i do not mind . but would be better to read some book in chess so u improve little bit of your rating and stop thinking that if someone has higher rating than you is cheater

gonzo you cheater!

i do not know why u think that if someone has 1600 live and 2000+ turn based means he use chess engine .my turn based rating vary 2100-2200 while my live is 1600+ i never use programs and other tools like analysing board but on turn based i spent 15-20 minutes to think and calculate while in live i spend 1-2 minutes per move and of course i do more mistakes.in my opinion players 2300+ should be suspected in using engines expecially when they have many games in progress and average time per move less than 3 hours and high percentage of wins over 80%.players 2000-2100 are weak i have played lot of them and i see luck of knowledge in their games.there is cheating forum group in this site u can read a lot about cheating there

"Granted in TBC you have more analysis time and higher ratings will be the outcome."

Why?  Both sides have equal opportunity to analyze. So, I don't see how that might affect ratings.  However, that said, some people do not analyze well quickly or have habits that don't translate well into speed chess and there can be a discrepancy between live and turn-based, but, like you, I think there should be some correlation and no GREAT discrepancy. If there is, something is rotten in Denmark.