Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

A New Opening?

[First day: http://blog.chess.com/dpruess/moving-internet-copperstate-chesstv]

On the second day, we only had one game. However, for some reason the morning was a blur, and I was busy the whole time. If I work hard at recollecting, I think this is what happened that day:

Danny had arranged some special events, to connect the visiting top-level players with the local chess community. A simul by GM Gareev of Uzbekistan and a lecture by GM Ramirez of Costa Rica-- or the other way around. There may have been more to it. I think it's really important to organize such things, and really get the most local value out of a high-level event. Anyway, I started out my day by getting up early and going along with Danny, to hang out with him and maybe lend a hand here and there.

The next item on the agenda was a BBQ at John LaLonde's house (if you read my first day blog, you'll remember him as the sponsor extraordinaire of the event, and this is one example of how much more he does for the tournament). Mr. Lalonde worked the bbq himself, and he and his family hosted about 20 players from the tournament. Here we also had a chance to play ping pong and swim in his pool. I was a bit worried that the powerful Arizona sun would blast right on through sunscreen without a second thought, but I couldn't turn down the hospitality, and jumped into the pool along with GM Amanov and the kids (photo by J. LaLonde, lifted with assumption of permission). It was glorious, and I emerged unscathed (from both the sun and the water war featuring high-powered water uzis and canons, and bombs).

So I arrived at the playing hall shortly before the game, with no idea what openings my opponent played-- and no idea what openings I play. For the past couple years I have been playing an un-researched and rather wide repertoire-- as white 1.e4, d4, c4, and the occasional f4 or Nf3; within each of those openings some different lines; as black vs. e4: French, Caro, Sicilian, and e5; as black vs. d4: Semi-Slav, Benoni, Benko, KID, Leningrad Dutch, Slav proper, and a few other occasional visitors. So the way I often select what opening to play on a given day is to wait for a mood to strike me. Then I say, ah yes, I feel like playing this way today, and go with that opening. However, on this particular day, I was just in a pingpong, food, and swimming pool mood; how to translate that into chess?

So I found myself in the tournament room, 5 minutes before game time, asking Sam: "quelle ouverture devrais-je jouer aujourd-hui?" We used French because my opponent and all the other players were there. We made sure to mention all openings, because the names are somewhat recognizable, even in French. Sam had taught me to play the Slav Defense on a car ride from Berkeley to Las Vegas once, and I had only played it twice in tournaments so far (=1-1). He suggested I play it, and I said ok, remind me of the three variations: [d4 d5 c4 c6 nf3 nf6 nc3 dc a4 bf5] Ne5 Nbd7 Nc4 Qc7 g3 e5 de Ne5 Bf4 Nfd7 Bg2 g5-- here Sam interrupted me, to tell me, there's another move possible there that he has just switched to: f6. hmmm, makes sense, defending the knight on e5. ok, merci, Sam, and I went into the game...

 

Other than the slip where I did not go for it with h5, it was a well-played and tense game for me. I felt pretty good after it, and looked forward to the rest of the tournament.

That's a wrap for day 2 of my Copper State International. Stay tuned for day 3 tomorrow, "Downs and Ups," when the action heats up as I start getting matched up with titled players. [http://blog.chess.com/dpruess/downs-and-ups]

Comments


  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    jlueke, tactically white can't go Rxf6 on move 26 because black has Nd3 and the white queen has to stop guarding the knight on e3, leading to significant material losses for white.

    if the white pawn were on a3 in the game continuation, then white would not lose that pawn, and would have the possibility of playing b5 at some point to open the black king. i would think the position would be an advantage for white, though perhaps black has enough to hang in there.

    pdela, hehe, glad you picked up on how hard we work!

  • 24 months ago

    pdela

    ouchhhemoticono animado gif de enfadados, enfadarse, enfados, disgustados, cabreados emoticon angry, angers...what hard is the preparation for a tourney! 

     

  • 24 months ago

    jlueke

    IM Pruess, that helps :-).   So it was more important that your bishops and knight can generate threats than getting one pawn or two.  If on move 26 white could trade his first rank rook for the dark squared bishop and black f-pawn would be position be close to even since now the blakc knight wouldn't be any better and the white king could hide better on dark squares?

    What about if on move 28 white's a pawn were on a3? How much better would that make white's position?

    I suppose I shouldn't worry about this too much and practice tactics but these are the type of questions I find the most enoyable in chess.

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    very glad to hear it! you're welcome!

  • 24 months ago

    SpaceOddity

    This was a great analysis.  I found the comments and sidelines quite illuminating.  Thank you.

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    jlueke i'm sorry i have not sufficiently explained it here, though i even tried!

    so first of all, if white did not play R4f2, then white could have defended a5 and then i think white is a little better. but in the position after black takes a5, black is better. here's why:

    bishop and two pawns are pretty similar in value to a rook in terms of long-term potential. concretely, black has 2 major positional advantages:

    1) his knight is anchored by the pawn on f5, whereas the white knight lacks a central support point. this makes black's knight significantly superior to white's.

    2) black's king is safer long-term than white's. black has the plan of eventually playing h5-h4 and the white king will be quite weak: breazy on both diagonals, and then his pawn cover eroding from the black h-pawn. whereas the black king is very very safe: the c- and a- files are solidly blocked/defended by the b7 pawn, so white's only approach to him is via rook penetration to the 7th or 8th ranks. but it seems the black bishops are up to the task of preventing that.

    not sure that makes it any clearer.

    glad you guys liked the commentary! games 4+5 are coming today...

  • 24 months ago

    tercerojista

    I always find your analysis to be highly instructive! Thank you! And congratulations on another win!

  • 24 months ago

    jlueke

    This was a really interesting game to watch as was your round 5 game, although the details of why black is better giving up the exchange are still beyond my ability to understand more than vaguely. 

  • 24 months ago

    RC_Woods

    nice annotations! I enjoyed skipping through the entire game. Very instructive.

  • 24 months ago

    pdela

    thanks for these posts David.

    I'm not sure I'm learning chess but for sure I'm learning English :)

  • 24 months ago

    sheardp

    my opponent played the rest of the game with the body language of resignation.

    Lovely comment. Worth playing through the game just for that.

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    on move 17 he went from 1:00 left to :54 to play Ne4 (we had a 30 sec increment and 1:30 to start with, time control at move 40). i went from :52 to :41 playing Qf7.

    thanks, Kevin!

  • 24 months ago

    NM ozzie_c_cobblepot

    What was the time situation on your 17th move, for both you and your opponent?

  • 24 months ago

    proKnight98

    that was a great game!

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    yeah, i showed the game to several strong players, and they all just wanted to play Be7 without even thinking on that move... till i pointed out to them what was going on. so qf7 is a moment where i can be selbstzufrieden.

  • 24 months ago

    csharpe

    Thanks for the post and commentary

  • 24 months ago

    NM ozzie_c_cobblepot

    David, I like how you present some of the nitty-gritty, in terms of how a top player approaches the opening and early middlegame phase of the game. I used to play a lot more by feel (playing Be7 would be an example) but recently in the last couple of years have been calculating a lot more variations, even in the late opening and early middlegame.

Back to Top

Post your reply: