Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Moving, Internet, Copperstate, ChessTV

At the beginning of June I moved to a new house. Of course this involved some heavy lifting and heavy cleaning. It also meant... signing up for new internet service. On which I am now waiting and waiting. Luckily a big chunk of the wait coincided with the Copperstate International in Phoenix.

I had a blast over there, and played 9 interesting chess games. Before I share some of them with you, permit me a few thank you's:

Thanks to IM Rensch for all his hard work putting this tournament together and giving lots of American masters a chance to play in a very strong tournament, without massive travel. A second thank you for going the extra distance to also make it the most "taken-care-of" experience I have ever witnessed at a tournament, edging out some European tournaments, and blowing out everything I have ever seen in the U.S. (note that I have never visited the new St. Louis Chess Club).

Thanks to John LaLonde (who also sponsors the event) for being one of the nicest-to-strangers men I've ever met (obviously also very nice to people he knows). He was at the site every day, asking the players how they were doing, how they liked everything, whether they had any other needs; and then taking care of all kinds of things.

Thanks to Shauna for her work with logistics, providing food, giving us rides, and for bringing the kids over to play with me :-)

Thanks to Mr. Haskell for his work as arbiter, being on top of all rules issues so that Danny could be confident about that aspect.

Thanks to GMs Yermolinsky and Amanov for discussing chess with me at Danny's house, and offering advice. Thanks to GM Dzindzichashvili for calling me up at an important point in the tournament with useful advice. And thanks to Sam and Kayden for joking around with me and making the tournament more fun.

Round 1: black vs the youngest and lowest-rated participant, 12 year-old Daniel Gurevich! This may have been the least interesting game to me, as it was not all that dramatic, or suspenseful for me, I could predict most of the moves and the way the game was going-- but such games are often very instructive, as they show a very clear line of play and conversion of an advantage.

 

More games coming soon! I'll try to add another 1 or 2 each day this week.

By the way, my current internet situation is the reason for the lack of chess.com/tv broadcasts. It is still not available at home, and ironically, the internet connection at the new chess.com office is also not yet strong enough to do broadcasts from there. Really a pity with some exciting chess going on: I would have loved to do a wrap-up of the Copperstate; to do my usual YGA show; to cover the Poikovsky tournament, or the Bazna Event, or Capablanca Memorial. Danny and I also have come up with some new shows. But we'll all have to wait in similar suspense for the green light to come on on my home's wireless router.

Keeping your Head (rd. 2)

Many people lose their cool when they suffer a reversal. Some completely lose their mind. Personally, I've noticed in the past when I used to play more online blitz that if I lost a game, I would tend to play more aggressively the next game. This would even happen in tournaments. It's like I'm so upset about losing, that I want to bury that emotional memory under a win as soon as possible, and so I play some hyper-aggressive way intended for immediate annihilation. Problem is that this often meant playing objectively terrible openings in my blood-rage.

Knowing this about myself, I immediately began preparing for the second round after losing that first round game. I'm not sure if I was in danger of losing my mind this time. I've lost to enough little kids of late, that it's becoming less of a surprise. On the one hand that might mean I can take it more in stride, and know that I can still have a fun week and a good tournament (there was a Miami Open where I lost to a 1900ish rated little kid in the first round, then won two exciting games against tough opponents later in the tournament, and found myself on a top board in the last round). On the other hand, you never know when the bad results will beat you down to the point where you suddenly overflow with pain and go psycho.

In any case, I was deciding how to play in round 2, and I decided to avoid sharp play. To purposely aim for a slow positional game, win it in the endgame. In this way, from the very first move, I would expect a long struggle, and hopefully this would stifle the "cover over my pain asap" instinct. So I sat down, played d4 quickly and...

 

Oh no! What was I to do? The Dutch Defense does not have my highest respect, and consequently, the only line I had learned or employed against it in the past 8 years or more was the very aggressive 2.Nc3-- a move which essentially aims at absolute refutation. Well, I knew white could play c4 and develop fairly reasonably, with a bit of a space advantage, and probably a kingside fianchettoe with g3. But I really would be poorly prepared, unless she played the Stonewall or Leningrad. Now that I am writing this, I suddenly realize those are by far the most probably Dutch variations-- what was I afraid of? Be that as it may, I reluctantly played the move I knew, only to be confronted by...

 

Oh my goodness. What is this? With the "normal" 3...Nf6 4.Bxf6 exf6 we could have returned to a positional and maneuvering game, which would have totally fit the bill. But what was I to do against this strange move? Play Bf4 which seemed ok, or play Bh4 offering a piece sacrifice, but dissuading Nf6, and seemingly more principled. My game plan was now out the window...

 

And so, I "got on the board" with my first point. Tomorrow, stay tuned for round 3, "A New Opening?"

Comments


  • 24 months ago

    IM ACEChess

    Great blog David.

    Danny

  • 24 months ago

    pdela

    hehe, I predict good luck, including a farewell party

  • 24 months ago

    FM Kacparov

    Don't worry about the loss, good luck for the next rounds!

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    cool. edit: i finally entered all my explanations for the second round game.

  • 24 months ago

    FM KaydenTroff

    Yep, Luke was the youngest one there and then me Smile

  • 24 months ago

    pdela

    Yup, I'm also 12 years old. 

    (& not everybody can find photos of bare wires Emoticono, smilies, gif animado de burla y provocación, molestar, incordiar)

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    haha, you always find the funniest icons/smilies/gifs

  • 24 months ago

    pdela

    Ha! I promise this is the last stupid comment I'll do

  • 24 months ago

    pdela

    you moved. you should have not done something stupid like getting married or so...

    nevermind.

    I followed the tourney, it seems you didn't thrive bad, so...

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    ah, thanks Kayden. was just guessing...

    means i may also be wrong about who the youngest participant was-- probably Luke?

  • 24 months ago

    FM KaydenTroff

    Daniel Gurevich is 12 years old not 10 if that makes you feel any better Smile

  • 24 months ago

    AMcHarg

    Hard lines on your loss in rnd 1 David.  Will be interesting to see how you did in your other games.  From my own experiences I sometimes find it's best that if you must lose then it should be in round 1 as it gives you a kick into gear rather than losing in say rnd 4 when it might stop your momentum dead.  It might also give you a slight advantage with the pairings thereafter but that depends on the opponents and pairing system.

    I watched the On-Demand with Kayden and I think it was Daniel but might be wrong.  Was very interesting anyway and it's great to see the entire picture of experiences that you strong players have in tournaments.  How you handle the ups and downs and control yourselves when faced with such long, difficult games is a lesson for us all.

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    Ani, that's my fide rating. it went down cause i lost lots of points, obviously. thanks for rubbing it in ;-)

    Knightsight and Devoid, glad you liked the shows! i had a feeling that those programs with Danny might have beaten everything else we'd done up till now, but because i did not have internet at home, i have not yet had a chance to watch them on-demand.

    Amy, i think that not only can IMs go psycho, but that the more time and effort people have put into chess, the more tendency they have to get upset after a loss. however, having more experience in chess competitions can also train many of them to handle the situation well. so what kind of a reaction you get varies greatly.

    as for the chess.com office-- our main attraction is a pingpong table. yeah!

    and everyone, sorry that my internet caused the final diagram not to upload yesterday. i'll now re-enter game 2.

  • 24 months ago

    SonofPearl

    When I moved house back in 2007 it took me over a month to get a working internet service again.  I hope your connection is up and running soon!

  • 24 months ago

    qixel

    I'm glad to hear that even an IM can go psycho after a loss.  I thought it was just we Class Ds.  I definitely always play worse after a loss because I can't control my emotions.

    And wow, I didn't know chess.com had a real office.  Does it have a par course and a weight room too?  I expect some day it'll have a corporate jet and a campus as big as Oracle's.Smile

    Amy

  • 24 months ago

    ArchBadger

    Thx, good to hear about your games! Keep it up, good play.

  • 24 months ago

    Knightsight

    Danny's chess tv shows were amazing.  His interviews were excellent to listen to as he drew out his guest GM and IM's thoughts and views.  The show with David and Kayden was also one of my favourites.  Even though they were shattered from playing hard games - what a great show they put on.

    Thanks to all staff for such great work.  We just love it.

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    hahaha, thanks. i'm getting a trickle from a neighbor at the moment, so maybe i'll add a second game tonight between my other work.

    we're just excited about all the great things we could be doing with chessTV, so looking forward to that..

  • 24 months ago

    ManoWar1934

    David, you have my sympathy. I moved to Berkeley in the fall of 1953 and discovered that they didn't have dial telephones! You picked up the receiver and heard an operator say, "Number, please." It was quite a surprise. I had seen several apartments that had Ice boxes instead of refrigerators, but phone service in this college town was way behind the curve. So, patience!

  • 24 months ago

    IM dpruess

    moved from richmond to berkeley, so yeah, 4 or 5 miles closer.

Back to Top

Post your reply: