Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Chess Comparisons: Martial Arts

I've said before that chess is, in actuality, a giant math problem.  This is true, but I also said humanity has not come close to solving it.  Because of this, chess seems to be more of a mental martial art right now than a math problem.

 

Martial arts stresses the importance of discipline.  Most people, when hearing the term "martial arts", think first about "fighting", then about "discipline".  Really, it's the same way with chess.  Chess is a brutal fight, not between two bodies, but two minds or mentalities.  Probably the more similar aspect of chess and martial arts is the discipline aspect.  Martial arts is tremendously disciplined.  Practitioners dedicate themselves to training in their art, whether it be Karate, Tae Kwon Do, Tai Chi Chuan, Jiu Jitsu, etc etc.  Chess has many "schools" of thought which chess players dedicate themselves to training in.  To name a few of those schools: aggressive, defensive, unorthodox, universal, tactical, or positional.  Chess players study for extremely long periods of time trying to improve their game, and they all set their sights high.  In some ways, chess is almost a quest for self-improvement.

 

The main difference between chess and martial arts is how one approaches such a battle.  When two Karate practitioners get ready to spar, odds are they are not doing very much conscious thinking.  When they train, they build up their technique until it becomes imbedded in their "muscle memory".  Much of a fight is based on instinct rather than foresight and calculation.  But in a sense chess can also be that way.  When we come to grip with the terms of the game and are good enough to play generally stable chess, we are taught to "trust our intuition".  I prefer to say "Trust your seemer."  Most people dismiss chess as a game, a war of pure calculation power.  But there is a deeper essence of chess.  It requires learning the techniques and principles to develop a feel for the game, until you can find a move and it just seems right to you, even if you don't know necessarily how (this was often the basis for Tal's brilliant sacrifices).  Instinct can often be just as valuable a tool in chess as it can be in the martial arts.  So what can we learn from this?

 

"Trust your calculation, and you'll never plan ahead.  Trust your feelings, and you'll be double-minded.  Trust your seemer, and you'll win game after game after game."

 

 

Thanks for reading!

edsnotofthisworld

Comments


  • 2 years ago

    gokumma

    as bruce lee said "Be like water my friends'' water can be clam yet it can put a hole in water don't be boggle down by style.

  • 3 years ago

    edsnotofthisworld

    More than likely.  It is unfathomable how large chess is.  In fact, the number of possible positions on a board is 10 to the 120th power.  So you're never going to run out of games. :-)

  • 3 years ago

    spencer1217

    then chess is the 2nd hardest math problem i have ever seen!

  • 3 years ago

    edsnotofthisworld

    If one is great at math and yet is a novice at chess, it is probably because chess is a harder math problem than most classes you will ever take in high school.

  • 3 years ago

    spencer1217

    ok so if chess is like math and i am great at math and sucky at chess how does that work out?

  • 3 years ago

    edsnotofthisworld

    The picture on the right is actually of IM Waitzkin practicing.

  • 3 years ago

    ZekesGhost

    Searching for Bobby Fischer" is a great human interest chess story - but a lotta Hollywood in the film version. Josh Waitzkin is a very interesting person in his own right. And I think he's a good illustration of the conundrum we have in chess of how much it is competition and how much self improvement. He has the "heart of a teacher" for sure and along with his credentials as an IM he also has gone very far in learning teaching methods and trying to come up with new ones, from what I understand of his post-chess career.

     

    Another person who is interesting in the way he combines chess with martial arts is Mig Greengard who does a popular blog column called, "The Daily Dirt Chess Blog" at ChessNinja.com here:  http://www.chessninja.com/dailydirt/

  • 3 years ago

    yullian

    IM Josh Waitzkin maybe interested you. He is a martial art champion also.

  • 3 years ago

    edsnotofthisworld

    Thanks!  When said "trust your seemer", I meant trust what seems right to you.

  • 3 years ago

    thisguyheisaguy

    brilliant read, keep up the good work.  but what's a 'seemer'?

  • 3 years ago

    edsnotofthisworld

    I said almost because chess is more of a quest for domination over another mind than being an altogether quest for improvement of your own.  If all chess was was studying, then it would be.

  • 3 years ago

    ZekesGhost

    "chess is almost a quest for self-improvement" Almost?? Hmmm ... what's wrong with this equation?

    I like the math analogy -- one of the most basic math truths about chess is that the game is in equilibrium (except for a small advantage in the opening for the White pieces that may last for as many as 15-20 moves) until one side disturbs the equilibrium by making a mistake. Thus one can never win a game by the force of their own brilliance -- we may only hope to see more and more subtle shades of mistake by our opponent to take advantage of.

Back to Top

Post your reply: