Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

"Oh, no! I have to play as black now?"

Yes, indeed. Chess.com has changed the live chess game seeks so members can no longer specify color. Members can still select color when challenging an individual, just not when putting up a seek. Color in game seeks is now assigned randomly by the software, with the goal of giving each player equal blacks and whites.

Why did chess.com make this change? Because it’s real chess.

In real chess, players take turns playing white because the first move almost always gives white the advantage. Of course you can win as black, but it’s a bit easier to win as white. That’s why your dad always let you play white when he was teaching you the game.

The other reason is that allowing color selection was creating some serious imbalances due to those “gotta have white” players. It goes something like this: 99 out of 100 players would prefer to play white more often. Give some players the option of choosing, and they’ll always choose white. Chess.com ends up with many, many “games seeking white” and very few “games seeking black.” Without intervention “a game seeking white” might quite literally rot waiting for a corresponding “game seeking black.”

For a long time the solution was to pair “games seeking white” with random seeks. However, this started throwing the random seekers’ statistics off. Instead of getting a truly random 50/50 black/white distribution, those of us who seek random were getting more like 55% black and 45% white. During one string of games, I got 10 blacks in a row. That’s not OK with most chess players.

Thus, the fellow who said to me “It’s none of your business if I always want to play white” was dead wrong. It was making a difference to all of us random seekers who would like play (and improve) in both colors.

So, chess.com’s fearless programmer and fearless leader bit the proverbial bullet and removed color choice from random seeks. The software now looks at your last 10 games, and attempts to “even you out” on your next game. Thus, if your last 10 games were white, you’re going to get black for a few games in a row until your last 10 games look a bit, um, darker. (Please be a good sport about this: aborting a seek that gave you black is not going to help. Seek again, and you’ll get black again.)

Some of you kicked. Some of you screamed. Some of you had tantrums of epic proportions. One notable example was the member who had 1900+ games as white and 27 games as black. Chess.com has been giving this fellow a crutch for a long, long time.

But I have news for all you “gotta have white” players. YOU CAN DO IT! Really! You, too, can play the black side of the board, and win! I consulted with chess.com live guru NM Zug and got some advice:

  • Try the French Defense: 1. e4 e6. This usually leads to a closed game with fewer tactical shots. (Grote’s note: In fact, my experience at the 1100-1300 level on chess.com is that it almost always leads to either the French Advance variation or the French Exchange variation. That will narrow your study considerably.)
  • Play good old 1. e4 e5 and stay in normal territory.
  • Against 1. D4, play the queen’s gambit declined: 1. D4 d5 2. C4 e6.

From one of my pals (and a darned good chess teacher) Deepozzzie, I have a link to a blog on basic opening principles.

http://blog.chess.com/deepOzzzie/chess-openings-the-fundamentals

Follow these principles and you can navigate through almost anything white will throw at you.

Use the chess.com opening explorer and book openings (under the “learn” tab) to learn more about some of your opening lines. If your opening as black doesn’t go well, step through it in opening explorer and see if you had better options on some of your moves.

Good luck! And learn to love the black pieces. If Anand can win the world championship – decisively – playing black, you can hold your own playing it here.

My best to all of you,

groteskbold

Comments


  • 22 months ago

    groteskbold

    "it would have been a nice addition except that I keep getting black 75% of the time I hate playing defensively its not my forte, and the fact that I'm forced to play black makes the game for me at least less fun, and its extremely less fun when your playing against players who are playing brilliantly as white while your stuck playing with a side you don't have experience with. It's a chess site people its not the FIDE let people have the freedom to choose which side to play"

    wanted-assassin: I looked at your last 10 games in live chess: you played five as black and five as white. The system is working exactly as it should.

    In order for you to have white more than half the time (most of the time, 100 percent of the time--whatever), other players need to be willing to play black more than half the time. Find players who are willing to do that for you, and challenge those players directly.

    You complain of not having experience playing black...there's only one way to get this experience--play as black.

    No, this is not FIDE, but it is real chess, played by real chess rules. There's no rule in real chess that allows players to choose what color they play. Real chess means playing black about half the time.

  • 22 months ago

    wanted-assassin

    it would have been a nice addition except that I keep getting black 75% of the time I hate playing defensively its not my forte, and the fact that I'm forced to play black makes the game for me at least less fun, and its extremely less fun when your playing against players who are playing brilliantly as white while your stuck playing with a side you don't have experience with. It's a chess site people its not the FIDE let people have the freedom to choose which side to play

  • 22 months ago

    Matthew11

    It seemed to work okay before this. Everyone would send out white challenges, someone took yours you would be white, and if you took theirs you would be black. But then you could be white all the time be only taking white challenges and just make white seeks. So I think it's good. And I don't get why everyone is so crazy for white, it's just a 1/2 tempo!

  • 24 months ago

    TopHatMister_OH_YES

    "Instead of getting a truly random 50/50 black/white distribution, those of us who seek random were getting more like 55% black and 45% white. During one string of games, I got 10 blacks in a row. That’s not OK with most chess players."

    Interesting, makes sense now. I thought I was just cursed!

  • 2 years ago

    groteskbold

    Schachgeek,

    Live chess pairing looks at games played, not at games paired then aborted.

    It's hard to prevent players who are not "in the know" from attempting to game the system by aborting pairings they don't like. These players will not accomplish anything other than annoying their opponents.

    If you're due black, you're going to get black until you play black.

    I'm a live chess moderator. We get fewer questions about color selection than we got when this change was first rolled out; however, we still get asked "how do I choose white?"

    An update has happened since I wrote this blog: the Live Chess pairing software has been updated to only look at games from the last 7 days.

    In other words, it will look back at 10 games, but only at games played in the last 7 days.

    If you haven't played for a couple of weeks, you get a clean slate. If your first game after two weeks is white, you'll be "due black" on game two.

    Sooner or later, that chessboard is going to get turned, and you'll find yourself behind the black pieces. Laughing

  • 2 years ago

    oozecube2

    I love the idea behind the change, and it will be a great relief to be read of all those seeks with the little (b) by them (meaning that I would have to play as black to play them). However, it is a little disappointing, because I liked to use it as a tool for training. I.E. I pick up the King's Gambit, I want to play a lot of white games to master it quickly. I.E. I pick up the King's Indian defense, I want to play a lot of black games to master it quickly. I'm really not objecting, because I know lots of people were horribly abusing it.

  • 2 years ago

    sixtyfoursquares

    I personally always loved playing BLACK.  Good job!

  • 2 years ago

    beane

    I like this change a lot.  It's frustrating playing people who won't agree to a rematch because the board switches.

  • 2 years ago

    RC_Woods

    to say that random automatically meant playing black is an overstatement though - I've played quite some games and the percentages were around 55 - 45.

    Still I'm happy that it will be more random now.

  • 2 years ago

    loved

    I hadn't given this much thought before, but it seems completely reasonable to assign color "randomly" as groteskbold has so succinctly explained. That's how we do it at our chess club here in town, and for subsequent games we alternate players with the colors.

  • 2 years ago

    hmmn

    yes...this is agood thing. Itoo am tired of the aborted games when Your opponent is the black side. When I play with friends, mates or strangers one always takes a black and white pawn and offers the blind choice. Random is ok with me and if you want towork out something from a white or black perspective it seems to me that Chess.com offers those options with the game explorer or analysis or computer workout. Cool

  • 2 years ago

    InternetLoveMachine

    Finally... 

  • 2 years ago

    Tomomori

    This a good change! Wink

  • 2 years ago

    diagonal

    I like that I could choose the side of board I was maneuvering because I used live chess games...etc. as a training tool. Yes, in tournament which side of the board you manevuer should be selected at random. By the way in modern chess it's blunders not side of board your maneuvering that gives you an advantage.  

  • 2 years ago

    Estragon

    People can still pick the color if they challenge a particular player.  It's in the random search for a game that the software allocates colors. 

     

    The thing that surprised me on the forum threads on the subject is that most of the objecting members are very low rated, at a level where color probably makes no significant statistical difference at all.  Why all the concern over the half a tempo edge White gets if you typically hang pieces and pawns all the time?

  • 2 years ago

    batgirl

    I'm glad they made the rated games color choice random.  Unrated should, of course, be optional since people play unrated for a variety of reasons and the outcome affects nothing.  While I don't really care which color I play, I used to always send seeks as White because otherwise I would be guaranteed to be Black.  I always thought that was an odd quirk.

  • 2 years ago

    Hypocrism

    We also need something to stop people aborting games when they are playing black. Maybe penalties for aborting too many games in a short interval with a certain rating difference?

  • 2 years ago

    satorichess

    Being one players who always (ALWAYS) choosed random seeks I hail this chess.com big improvement.

    Well done guys......and now let's play chess

  • 2 years ago

    exigentsky

    No, unfortunately random is actually NOT random and I guess that's fine as long as it adjusts logically. However, I think it's completely dumb to not allow color selection in UNRATED games.

  • 2 years ago

    groteskbold

    Jagdeep Singh, I do not know.

    I guess I wonder why anyone would feel such a need to game the system. It wouldn't be a true indication of chess ability, which is the ability to play from both sides of the board.

Back to Top

Post your reply: