^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Marshall Strikes Again

Submitted by kenytiger on Tue, 06/24/2008 at 9:13am.

Because Alexander Alekhine was probably the greatest tactician in the history of Chess, it is always interesting to read the comments of his opponents on his style. One significant observation is that, whereas in most tactical sequences it is the first move that is the most startling, in Alekhine's case it was the final move that was amazing.

But the most starling effects are achieved when one player springs his surprise and finds it topped by a reply even more surprising. As we would expect, Frank Marshall, who was an outstanding master of the gimmick, gives us some of the most delightful examples. One of his neatest efforts turned up in the formidable tournament at Saint Petersburg in 1914. Marshall's victim was the famous and sharp tactical Master Jacob Bernstein.

Black's position doesn't look promising for various reasons. He has not castled, and his Queen's position is insecure. The position of his pieces is inharmonious, and it is not clear how they can cooperate with each other.

On the other hand, Black has pressure on White's backward c-pawn. A Master of clever attacking play, Bernstein has worked out a subtle but very risky plan based on the weakness of the c-pawn.

(Notes by American Grandmaster Al Horowitz)


» posted in kenytiger's Blog
 

Comments:

by NM GreenLaser - 2 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 604
Black was Dr. Ossip S. Bernstein (1882-1962).
by woodencardboard - 2 months ago
Missouri United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 82

I completely missed the annotation, thanks for the feedback and corrections.


by cgs - 2 months ago
Veszpre'm Hungary
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 467

Two analyzing are inaccurate.

Orejano: Keep a check on your analyzing! You described 7... fxe5, than: 8.Qe7 #. Also described 7... fxg5, than 8.Qxa5 and White has Queen against Rook.

Loomis: This is the right move after 5... Qxa3. I describe rightly: 6.Qxc3. White has simple quality advantage. The exchange of Queens is obligatory. If 6... Qa2 than 7.Qc7 fxe5 8.Qd8+ Kf7 9.Qxd7+ Kg6. Rook advantage for White.

Finally Woodencardboard: 6... Nb3, than 7.Qc7. There is a mate-threatening on d7 and thretened the Black Queen. The two trhreatening are undefended.

Of course, if I'm not mistaken. 5.Qd2 is fantastic observation. Thanks for the demonstration.


by JG27Pyth - 2 months ago
NYC United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 184
Or what about: 6...Nb3 ?  I think 6...Nb3?  7. Qc7 +- (Edit: this very move is in fact given in the game annotation.)
by woodencardboard - 2 months ago
Missouri United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 82

Or what about: 6...Nb3 ? The knight is weak initially after the queen trade, but white has to cleanup its position and black can use that lost tempo to retreat it to d3.

And, I don't see viable refutes of the queen trade either.


by marl-shie - 2 months ago
Manila Philippines
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 152
Wow!
by Loomis - 2 months ago
Durham, NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2153
5. ... Qxa3 6. Qxa3 might be a better choice for white than 6. Rxa3.
by orejano - 2 months ago
Concepcion del Uruguay Argentina
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 588

White black didn't played 5... Qxa3 ?

5...Qxa3 6.Rxc3 Qxb4 7.Rc8+ Bxc8 7.Qxb4 fxg5 (or fxe5).

White still should win but I think that's a better continuation.


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.