Underestimating your Opponent's Threats (2)

Submitted by kenytiger on Mon, 08/18/2008 at 10:57am.

In the following position Black played...h6 under the impression that this wins White's Bishop. This reasoning seems convincing, as a move of the menaced Bishop will lose the White Queen. How does White's aggressively posted Rook at g3 spoils this plausible plan?

(Notes by Fred Reinfeld)

» posted in kenytiger's Blog
 

Comments:

by NinjaBear - 15 months ago
Salt Lake City (USA) China
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 682

Same question as Askham: Why not windmill the last pawn on a7?

by kenytiger - 15 months ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1062

Benws, you are correct. Black didn't just moved ...h6, plus, I didn't even know who the players were, so I went ahead and reworded the introduction and added the players' names to the diagram. Thanks for pointing that out.

by benws - 15 months ago
NC United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1168

ah, i remember this one. Torre vs Lasker, right? pretty good sac.

but one thing-black's last move was not ...h6. go over the game and you will see that torre played a series of moves to get the black queen unguarded.

by tbuk - 15 months ago
Birmingham United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 115

Opens up the file with a2 unguarded, I suppose. Very good windmill though. xD

by dwaxe - 15 months ago
Thousand Oaks, California United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 1044

Black would then also take the white a pawn, activating black's rook for an even material trade. Black still has an inactive rook this way.

by Askham - 15 months ago
Yorkshire England
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 59

Couldn't white have really sealed the deal by taking the a-pawn as well during the windmill tactic?

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.