5867 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Black
Inaccuracies: 2
Mistakes: 0
Blunders: 2
White
Inaccuracies: 6
kielejocain
The numbers are an attempt to sum up the relative positional imbalances in terms of "pawns." So you could say, if you were White, I were Black and the score was +0.06, that you were up 6% of a pawn. Of course, computer analysis is extremely finicky, so such tiny numbers probably shouldn't carry much weight. But if the computer says you're up (or down) by at least 0.50, I'd say that's significant.
The sign on the number just indicates who is theoretically up; positive numbers favor White, negative Black. At least, that's the convention adopted by this site (and thus by my converted analyis); my chess engine scores each move relative to that player.
TheAOD
How do you interpret the negative numbers. Is that on a scale of -10 to +10? I guess I'm just wondering how this works...
kielejocainUnited States
View complete profile
Analysis: Ken-Krishna v. kielejocain (1/05/09)
by kielejocain 3 years ago
Analysis: HPM v. kielejocain (2/01/09)
Analysis: ButterflyBliss v. kielejocain (12/30/08)
Posting analysis