Strategy of 'My System', Lesson 1

Submitted by likesforests on Fri, 07/25/2008 at 1:43pm.

We're learning chess strategy from the classic My System by Aaron Nimzowitsch. I'm your guide, likesforests. Grab a cold one, pull up a chair, and enjoy. :)



§1.1 You develop a piece by moving it off the back rank and towards your opponent. Develop all your pieces before moving any piece twice.

Players in the 1400-2000 range tend to be aggressive developers, but I found an example where someone from our group missed an opportunity:

Question: How should White defend his knight?

Answer: In the game 5.c3?! was played, but 5. Be3! is stronger. It's better strategically since it develops a piece. It also sets the tactical threat Nxc6 bxc6 Bxc5 when White wins a piece.


§1.2 Pawn moves are not developing moves, but one or two are required for development.

  • You have to move pawns to develop most of your pieces.
  • If your pawns don't occupy the center, your opponent can demobilize your pieces!

Demobilization explains why we put pawns in the center and how to exploit when our opponent doesn't. Pawns have a lust to expand and their advance can force our opponent to demobilize (undevelop his pieces) or at least flee to less useful squares.

 

 

Pawn moves in the opening should support development or fight for the center. But his target of making only 1-2 pawn moves is suspect. You have to make at least two pawn moves to develop the bishops, and Nimzowitsch usually made three pawn moves in his openings.

John Nunn: "A good rule of thumb is no more than 3 pawn moves in the first 8 moves."


§1.3 A lead in development is an ideal.

A good opponent matches your development. One trick to get ahead is to simultaneously develop a piece and attack one of our opponent's pieces which is already developed.

Scandinavian Defense

White to move after 1.e4 d5 2.exd5 Qxd5. Black has a lead in development, but 3. Nc3! allows White to catch up by simultaneously developing and attacking the queen.

Scotch Game

White to move. A chess.com member played 6.Bg5 in this position.

Question: Could White have gained a development tempo by playing 6.e5!?

Answer: The alert reader will note 6.e5!? is not a developing move, so after 6...Nh5 or 6...Qe7 the answer is no. But the very alert reader will see 6...Nh5 is refuted by 7.g4! and 6...Qe7 is refuted by 7. Be2!. Black must play ...Ng8 so yes 6.e5 wins a development tempo.


I welcome criticism and even praise if you feel it's deserved. Lesson 2 will be out next Friday... if you haven't already, Add me as a Friend to enjoy it hot off the press!

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Comments:

by pHwnstar007 - 12 days ago
Rochester United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 13

I have my system....Nimzowitsch is a convoluted drunk who thinks rooks swim and dance....thank you for putting his ideas in everyday language.

by figrock - 7 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

Bravo...Bravo...! Great post..! Cool

by BlackOps - 9 months ago
New York United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 79

I will have to come back again.

by Nytik - 11 months ago
Southampton United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 4553

The first position in this blog occured in one of my games about a week ago, and I did play Nxc6 winning a piece.

Which means this stuff does actually help in real gamesĀ Smile

(So as not to put myself down, Im not saying I wouldnt have seen it anyway. Just that this is really good and helpful stuff!)

by lapin - 13 months ago
Thessaloniki Greece
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 2021

Good "lesson one" guide.

by kl1172 - 13 months ago
Olen Belgium
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1

Already learn't something extra while I allready knew all these development basics. You can make it look really really simple in this course!

greetings

Kim

by xbigboy - 13 months ago
Minnesota United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 2830

You should publish this stuff in books!

by hptchess - 14 months ago
Warwick United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 262

Nice job!

by Dmaster995 - 14 months ago
Yonkers, NY United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 154

I like.

by narutofanforever - 14 months ago
United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 758

Great!

by likesforests - 14 months ago
United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 4407

Howdy, BDK! Glad you stopped by. :)

by BlueDevilKnight - 14 months ago
United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 55

Great stuff, thanks for putting it out here for all of us to see.

Glenn: hey, wait, I didn't think you believed in strategy! Surprised

by mpk2klang - 14 months ago
Sentosa OK China
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 113

thanks, i will learn it, keep me inform, TQ, & GOD BLESS

by gjsgregskyplayer - 14 months ago
Okeechobee United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 166

I am presently in a rehab and I brought some books w. me to study. I have lots of time! Unfortunately, I left M y System at home and brought Capablancas 60 best chess endings and a book on tactics. What a pleasant surprise to see this book studied and discussed right here on chess.com. I am very grateful to likesforests for his interesting analysis. I am relatively a new player and this helps me tremendously. Thank you!

by normajeanyates - 15 months ago
london [often in calcutta india] England
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2597

likesforests wrote: Yes, it's quite possible that White mixed up the move order. The better we understand the moves, the less likely we are to mix them up. :)

The sentence I boldfaced is an excellent maxim!

by likesforests - 15 months ago
United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 4407

logis10> First diagram: c3 is played but only after 5. Be3 Qf6 6. c3 , so it's possible the white player mixed up moves.

Yes, it's quite possible that White mixed up the move order. The better we understand the moves, the less likely we are to mix them up. :)

logis10> Last diagram: e5 might win a tempo but is not a developing move.

Aye, that 6.e5!? is not a developing move is stated in my text above:

"The alert reader will note 6.e5!? is not a developing move... Black must play ...Ng8 so yes 6.e5 wins a development tempo."

But 6.e5 Ng8 wins a development tempo, so the answer to "Could White have gained a development tempo by playing 6.e5!?" is "Yes!" For example, if 6.Nc3 the state of piece development is 2 vs 1, while if 6.e5 Ng8 7.Nc3 it's 2 vs 0.

by logis10 - 15 months ago
Aarschot Belgium
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 4

First diagram: c3 is played but only after 5. Be3 Qf6 6. c3 , so it's possible the white player mixed up moves.

Last diagram: e5 might win a tempo but is not a developing move.

by likesforests - 15 months ago
United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 4407

aabbccdd, I was White. I played 5.e5 and he answered 5..Ng8. But I still lost!

Well-played in the opening. I see you're an active tournament player in Canada... that's great! Gaining an advantage is half the battle... converting that advantage is the other half. You're going to have to be alert to tactics. Beyond that, if you want to jump ahead, in lesson 2's "Extra Credit" section I point out two instructive examples of converting better development. Maybe you will find those useful  :)

by kid_of_chess - 15 months ago
Ottawa,Ontario Canada
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5633

Hey, I once got into that schotch game position except with a minor adjustment.

I was White. I played 5.e5 and he answered 5..Ng8. But I still lost!

by chessbuzz - 15 months ago
Miami, Fl United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 59

Great job in presenting the ideas behind My System in a clear way.

« Previous | 1 2 3 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.