The computer does things like this to me all the time. I submitted one of my live chess games a while ago and I was playing moves that I had memorized ahead of time from practicing grandmaster games but the computer was calling them inaccuracies and mistakes... I trust a GM over a computer any day.

The computer analysis is not a good engine to trust to begin with anyway because any move that it wouldn't play is called a mistake but the move may not actually be a mistake but instead the fact that the computer is not very strong. 

you see Malachi a computer evaluates the moves on factors such as coverage of key squares, combination of pieces, probability of opponents next move etc.

however .....our wonderful human-brains are capable of far greater subtlety & insight than that. Also ridiculous human qualities like aesthetic appearance of the board & the pieces influence our moves & responses. And as our opponent (hopefully) is human also this is reflected in their moves too.

that is why it takes such a complicated processor to defeat a human-being at chess & that is why such contests are unfulfilling. There is no elegance, delight or amusement in the gameplay of the chess pieces.

if you remember this it is very easy to spot when your opponent is using a computer program ( ie. cheating !! ) against you....

I'll take a win over the opinion of a machine EVERY time

a very sharp and destructive danish gambit . as for the computer analysis I think its a further demonstration that engines for how sophisticated may be can never be a substitute to human creativity and imagination . brillant game