Smyslov - or the "art of simplification"!

Submitted by mauerblume on Wed, 05/27/2009 at 5:43am.

                                The Art of Simplification

 

In my last post I have praised the crystall-clear positional play of Akiba Rubinstein. His games were the favorites in my youth.

Now I have become much older , but I prefere nevertheless the good and clear positional play.

And in the last years I liked more and more the games of

Vasily Smyslov

(this is a link)

Vasily Smyslov in 2002

 

His games have become for me a source of inspiration.

In my view his strongest point was the simplification from a middlegame position into a better or won endgame. It happens so often in his games, that we have to  presume one of his main winning methods behind it.


Here a game where he demonstrates this effective method of simplificationmasterfully


                                            Smyslow -Vidmar
                                            (Groningen 1946)

 

In the starting position we see, that white has a clear adventage. He is a pawn ahead in a calm position

 

Nevertheless the position is not so easy to win. There are different coloured bishops on board and they have a high draw tendency in endgames.

So let us see, how Smyslov managed it to transpose the position into a won endgame. He started a process of simplification

 

 

 

I think here we could see how his  art of simplification  had worked.

Have one more look at the endposition of the simplification. A clear better endgame.

***

For those who want to see the rookendgame also. Here it is:

 

» posted in mauerblume's Blog
 

Comments:

by Knightguy - 7 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 1575

Nice lesson Heinrich, thank you!

I also do not understand though why he did not play g7 at the end, assured of promoting the pawn, but he had the game regardless.

by DaPharaoh - 8 months ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1371

it looks like f5 was just assuring victory.. He would have won with g7 but f5 is overkill

by ArjanA - 8 months ago
Nijmegen Netherlands
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 29

I really would like to know why he played f5 in that last game..........

by DaPharaoh - 8 months ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1371

yea Smylov plays an interesting game of chess!

by Peter_Gachev - 8 months ago
Bulgaria
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 35

nice position, but its very hard to think so many moves ahead

by byanothername - 8 months ago
London United Kingdom
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 9

I will look at some more of these Smyslow games. Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this - it's very interesting.

Mike

by JimEBau - 8 months ago
Deltona, FL United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 3730

The endgame is my weakest link (well, that and board blindness, particularly with diagonals).  I like real-world examples that help me to see how to approach the endgame tactics.  Thanks for the post, Heinrich.

by Mrki - 8 months ago
Belgrade Serbia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 55

Yes!!! I saw most of the moves in advance(well not all of them, curse the beer!!!). This is art, makeing your small advantage become  biger, no fancy tactic, no strategy talk, just do the thing, push the pawns, cover the squares. To be fair Vidmar was past his prime at that time, but still nice endgame.

by greatexcalibur - 8 months ago
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 2550

Good endgame theory, Heinrich! I like simplification when the time is right, like in your example.. Smile

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.