Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The best openings as Black

Question looks simple, what are the best openings as Black?

When I was playing OTB as a junior, being a proud "child of informator", I wanted to win as Black, who doesn't?

Having lots of time to study openings, I chose the best based on what I was seeing the best chose as Black. Back then my view was that best equals Fischer and Kasparov so I played the Najdorf and the King's indian. Later on I added the Benko and the Sicilian Dragon (after Kasparov employed the Soltis variation vs Anand).

I read allot about these openings, was lucky enough to have a well known coach, second of a very well known GM, who was also providing me analyses.

This tactic payed off several times, probably the most happy moments were some miniatures versus a couple of FMs, while being below FM level myself.

Chess was taking too much time however and I had to quit it, after all I had to prepare for Uni instead of preparing for tournaments.

Having stopped playing OTB and not having a clue about internet chess (if it was there in the 90s) my main involvement in chess was playing against some friends from the club (from expert to FM level), started reading "real chess" literature, instead of memorizing Dragon-Yugoslav-Soltis move 27, I read Nimzowitsch, endgames, Dvoretsky and studied games by world champions.

After reading all that I realized one thing, I never knew anything about chess, I just was good at tactics, like most junior players, and could calculate good enough to get a win after a won position in the opening.

Then work+later uni years didn't allow me to play chess but last year I started playing again online. I still have my old notebooks but most of the analysis is now irrelevant, mainly because "fashionable" lines change as time passes.

If playing chess again was to bring decent results, I had to choose a Black repertoire taking in mind that now I can't sit in my room studying chess all day seven days per week like I used to, I live abroad and therefore the magnificent trainer I had cannot train me atm, my dad will no longer be paying for 4 new chess books per month (bit too old for those "dad stipends") so playing razor sharp lines was out of the question.

Another factor is that long breaks from chess cause big hits in ability to calculate, endgame knowledge, position evaluation etc, (oddly they do not affect planning!), so I had to (and still do) spend time on revision of Dvoretsky, endgames etc.

Lastly, I am not happy anymore to beat an opponent because I memorized something, being creative sounds more fun for a hobby!

This led to new "best" openings, that I can afford to learn and hopefully one day master. These are the Caro-Kann and Queen's Gambit Declined. They have allot to teach me about chess and I have allot to learn from trying to grind equality rather than just relying on wild tactics.

Sure they provide very little, if any at all, chances to win as Black but if this was good enough for great masters like Capablance, Karpov and Petrosian, who am I to argue if these openings can be the "best"?

The only downside is that it takes time to learn these new openings, after 3 months of playing them almost exclusivelly, I still feel that home is Najdorf/King's indian and I'm making mistakes in my new repertoire. Like any "house move" I guess this one as well takes time before I can consider the new positions which arise on board as "home".

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    pentagram

    Oooops a correction "a couple of FMs, while being below FM level myself" replace FM with NM! same goes for "(from expert to FM level)" !.. (from expert to NM level).

    I am leaving the post intact with the errata but no, I never won vs a 2300+ player OTB.

  • 3 years ago

    pentagram

    I hope mail chess boosts me as well!

     The style I had then was very aggressive with both colors and the part where I did best was concrete positions as I could calculate quite fast and ,for my level, reasonably accurately, I would say typical junior player skills.

     My calculation skills have gone down the drain though after so many years away from the game. Also while I didn't play, I read about chess and this new information that I learned makes me think differently, e.g. now I am much more concerned about what endgames will arise after some exchanges/pawn pushes.

    I will stick with Caro/QGD until I learn how to play them, at least in the near future (say 1-2 years) my main goal is to try and master these systems. After that I may add some want-to-win-with-black systems but certainly not as complex as KID or Najdorf, maybe Benko & Alekhine!?

  • 3 years ago

    hardland

    Good article.

    Me myself stopped playing for 22 years,... and having came back in 2004, I it took me 4 years to get were I was...

    Mail Chess helped me a lot to improve, of course.

    I definitely think that the election of a repertoire relies heavyly on your personality and the kind of player you are.

    So I'm playing Pirc and Kings' Indian as black anytime I could. And Anglo Indian for c4. There are another defenses I would like to play with black (Benoni, by example, and Hyperacelerated Dragon), but I think I must focus in mastering a litle repertoire, and then expand it. 

    Maybe in 2010 I will begin with some more lines, but for the moment, that suits my needs.

  • 3 years ago

    pentagram

     Thanks for reading :) After loosing many blitz games vs the Budapest (had no clue what the theory is), this week I worked on the "Budapest section" of my notebook, hope it helps my score vs it (now should be close to 0% Laughing ).

     The White repertoire you mention is what I was thinking initially as well, as I was an 1.e4 player (now, for the last 3 months I struggle to learn 1.d4) and I had played the Closed Sicilian in the past but I went for 1.d4.

     From the very little I have learned about 1.d4 (I knew 1.e4 quite decently for my level of play), I think that White has all the choices there so it would allow me to play main lines. In 1.e4 if I wanted to play e.g. main lines vs 1. ..e5 and 1. ..c5 I had to make preparation from the O'Kelly Sicilian to the Marshall Gambit in Ruy Lopez, not to mention the Najdorf & Dragon. In 1.d4 I feel White is the one who chooses most lines after Black has commited to a specific defense. E.g. in 1. ..d5 I need to prepare one line in QGD (exchange), one line in QGA and one line for Slav/Semi Slav, allot less preparation than 1.e4 e5 if I wanted to play the Ruy there. Maybe this evaluation will change when I learn more on 1.d4 and it may well turn out that there is at least as much theory there.

    Of course there is a downside to that, a totally new repertoire with White as well means many new positions to understand and many new lines to memorize.

    BTW there is a book by John Emms which contains analysis on the Bishops Opening & the Closed Sicilian, which had received good reviews. The other lines it offers is KIA vs the French, 2. c4 Panov-Botvinnik attack vs the Caro, 150 attack vs the Pirc/Modern, I played a couple of games in this repertoire my feeling is that his choices give White an edge (from tiny to big) in most of the lines!

  • 3 years ago

    polleke

    Good post! I am struggling with the same! Work takes up so much time now that decent chess study is not possible anymore. I also picked only a few openings that I play sort of exclusively (Budapest, Caro-Kann, Bishops opening and Closed Sicilian). All relatively easy to learn and still a lot of fun. Nice to have you in the Budapest group!

Back to Top

Post your reply: