The English Fighting Toad: A new system

Submitted by pyre_phire on Thu, 01/15/2009 at 9:03am.

Yes, it really is a real opening - at least as far as I'm concerned and who cares what anyone else thinks? Its a variation of the Latvian gambit 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f5 The mainline in that is N takes pawn and then black must go active with the queen in some sharp tactical lines. I don't like losing my e pawn though so for me, I guess its a system more than an opening line that plays Nc6 before f5, also, against a different 2nd move than Nf3 I will delay the f5 push because I don't want any queen checks. So after an average opening I can end up with something like:

 

Black will then be looking to play Nf6 with an eye to a d5 push. Often where White plays an Italian game, this can even be accomplished with a gain of tempo where the white bishop is pushed in to the wings, or moves to pin the c6 Knight - in which case the bishops must move to protect the implicitly threatened e pawn.

 

 

When it works, you can end up with a position like:

 

This is after only 6 moves as well ( 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 f5 4. exf5 Nf6 5. b3 d5 6. d3 Bxf5) Maybe White played a poor opening but nevertheless Black can gain a strong advantage against an indecisive opening from White and it is black who gains a strong centre and open lines. That particular game went on 7. Bg5 Bb4 8. Qd2?? (Be7 was needed) d4 9. a3 Bxc3 and White resigned.

 

 

I am sure there are players on here who can refute the EFT or whatever you want to call it, and you are invited to do so. However, it is a decent way of playing a sort of King's Gambit with black for those who like the sound of such a risky proposition and more than anything else, it can be a lot of fun.

Your friend, Martin

» posted in pyre_phire's Blog
 

Comments:

by pyre_phire - 9 months ago
Portsmouth United Kingdom
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 47

Yeah, like the King's Gambit this is one opening I'm trying to grow out of. It seems to require that the opponent make some inaccurate moves, particularly accepting the gambit though I've had strong openings with it where they didn't. Computer analysis shows black to be down by more than half a pawn in a position I thought was fundamentally sound. Perhaps I need to think about trying out the Dutch defence if I like pushing black's f pawn...

by socket2me - 10 months ago
Ft. Collins, Colorado United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 536

 Sounds like a discovery... develop it.  But remember, the opponent has to react to the same theory in order for it to develop.  Everyone knows every game is different, and different moves will be made to differ the solution.  However, I am learning chess and am new, but that is my take. 

by nfsinlife - 10 months ago
Scotland
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 7

if u ask my view this kinda opening is really good for player's opponents who r near 1300-1600,but when some1 reach a high level than that he may not be abled to overcome that pawn loosed and might even risk losing his control over the king side and might need to do consequential sacrificies which may lead to weakening of the positions of black anyways nice meeting u and good day to u cya around bye

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.