^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Adolf Anderssen vs. Wilhelm Steinitz (Part 7)

Submitted by qtsii on Mon, 06/23/2008 at 5:54am.

Steinitz match, 1866

In 1866 Anderssen lost a close match with 30-year-old Wilhelm Steinitz (6 wins, 8 losses, no draws; level at 6-6, then Steinitz won the last 2 games)[28] Although Steinitz is now known for inventing the positional approach to chess and demonstrating its superiority, the 1866 match was played in the attack-at-all-costs style of the 1850s and 1860s. This is generally seen as the point at which Steinitz succeeded Anderssen as the world's leading active player. Although ideas of a contest for the world championship had been floating around since the 1840s, the 1866 Anderssen-Steinitz match was not defined as being for the world championship and such a claim could not easily be made while Morphy was alive.

 

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Anderssen


» posted in qtsii's Blog
 

Comments:

by qtsii - 2 months ago
Machiavelli United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 1525
You know me the more participation the better and since Morphy is one of my all time favorites I always appreciate input about him...
by GrimReaper7752 - 2 months ago
Darkest depths of Hell United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 165

Steinitz -Morphy would've been one great match for chess history. It is a shame it never happened. Morphy had at this point, supposedly lost his sanity. I have heard some weird stories about what happened to my favorite player Morphy.

That after being dismissed by the love of his life as a "mere chessplayer". Also, he did not have great success with his law career which was what was most important to him. I have also heard he would only eat food cooked by his mother. I really do wonder if he blamed chess for his lack of success in life afterwards. Do consider that at this time a man was judged by his career.

This is all things I have read or heard I can't quote sources ( as I have read to many books to even attempt at keeping track). They are just things I remembered about my all time favorite player and found intriguing. Things that made me wonder why genius is usually so misinterpreted till it is too late. Sorry to fill your Andersson blog with Morphy stuff.


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.