Haha, R I an idiot....? NO NO NO!!! Cuz I know that it cant be a 2056 rated player that played something like this against you???/ Fairly speakin, the opponent was either in a sleep, awfully strangled at something or a complete disaster. And dont analyse blitz games, they are tooo worthless to study. And In my conscience, it is not the game you can tag as Evergreen... I mean it is worrying to see such a weak play from a strong opponent.

No lie Eager_Knight.  It happened but I could care less if you believe it.  Take care patzer.

this is a lie... your opponant wwas never 2056 only 1056 .. if yoou had beat a 2056 player it would of shown up under your :best wins: your best win was a 1300 player LOL

Nice game Wesso. Your opponent's play was not great, but give yourself credit.

interesting thoughts about the knight, 8 atack peaces (when not around the border) is indeed a lot thats as much as a bishop on a long diagonal (but then  bishop or queen in the center would even strike more). Still i think using knights this way is indeed interesting worth to study; the main problem with knights is their unpredictive nature i think; they dont move random, but it looks a lot like it; its seams harder to predict; which combinations of other peaces will be effective after a few future knight moves; working with 2 knights this way doubles that effect. As long as you dont use them to defend each, they are the strange forces on the bord.

(letting them defend each is often predictable, and keeps them locked in position also often)