^ Click here to remove ads! ^

A thought process in chess

Submitted by RichardHayden on Wed, 07/25/2007 at 8:06am.

In response to a question on what you should think about before you move ...

 

As an experienced player, here is my ten-step thought process when playing over the board ...

1. Did I lock the car?

2. I wonder if there is any food for sale?

3. What IS that smell?

4. Is there anything good on TV tonight?

5. How does this opening go again? 

6. This joker doesn't think he can beat me, does he? 

7. Where did that piece come from?

8. Am I really going to lose to this guy?

9. Why do I play this game? 

10. What time does the bar open?

Laughing

 

More seriously, here is what I hope is a more useful response: 

The thought process has to be tied to the level of play you currently are at and the stage of the game. Once you reach a certain standard your thinking should be about evaluating whether your PLAN is going to work, based on each new move. You have a PLAN, right?

 

If you don't have a plan you are really just 'pushing wood' to see what happens, and trying to avoid blunders. That's OK, as until you can avoid blunders most of the time a plan isn't much use. 

 

For less experienced players, a thought process ought to include the following items: (Once you have a certain level of ability and experience some of these questions don't require too many brain cycles to answer!):

1. what did my opponent just do?

2. was it legal?

3. am I in check? 

4. can I force checkmate? 

5. can I take the piece my opponent just moved?

6. is it safe to take the piece my opponent just moved?

7. did the piece my opponent just moved leave others unprotected?

8. why did my opponent do that?

9. can my opponent take anything?

10. what is my opponent trying to accomplish next?

11. if I had threats before my opponent's last move, do they still work?

 

Once you can answer these questions, you are ready to think about more complex tactics. You are also ready to analyse the position to determine the relative strengths and weaknesses of both White and Black, and what you should do about it. This is planning. It takes time and effort. But when you can create a plan and execute it, reacting and modifying it in response to your opponent's best efforts, then you are really raising the standard of your play and will provide a challenge to strong players.

 

'How to reasses your chess' by Jeremy Silman does an excellent job of helping you analyse the position and come up with a suitable plan.

 

Comments:

by linksspringer - 7 months ago
Scotland, UK Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1957
warwind, were you perhaps talking about your win against me? Embarassed Wink
by warwind - 7 months ago
Iloilo Philippines
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 140

I like he thought process u got here..let me share my thought process in one of my games  here in chess.com

1. What opening is he planning to do? Did he really know it? Do i have to follow booklines or should i invent new moves to keep him outbalance?

2. See i thought i told you not to invent new moves you are not familiar with now look what happen boy now i'm in trouble?

3. Ooops i think he made a mistake. He should not have move that..now im on the game.

4.There's no good move i can't think of. All lines points to a draw or unclear.Ill just play a waiting move. I can wait until kingdom come if thats what he wants.

5. Am getting impatient he seems to see every plan i make. I  just have to make more solid moves for as long as my pieces would be in active play i would be fine.

6. Boy!Watch out for blunder and dont hurry to make a move I got 3 days to respond.

7. Well let me see...this guy is really tough. Perhaps it would be better if i just offer him a draw? Nah  i can see some weakness in his move, hes rather tired or perhaps bored. Its time to strike!!

8. Finally i got the advantage because of his mistake. Well that is chess all about. How to capitalize on your advantage to convert to wins.

9. Good Game. Nice playing with you

10. I wonder whats dinner tonight?   :)

by StacyBearden - 8 months ago
New Caprica United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 900
Excellent post. Thank you!
by verusamo - 12 months ago
Kingston, OK United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 308
Thanks! I am going to write these down so I don't forget!
by ChessDweeb - 12 months ago
Sudburry Canada
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 638
Excellent list. I'm still at the "looking for checks, captures and threats" stage. If I actually think about them when I play, I'm happy.
by chessiq - 12 months ago
Malawi
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 610

Nice explanation, Richard! I hadn't really considered something like that. I feel that your reasoning/list requires more "meditation" as well as "study" to fully appreciate it. If you have the time, I would suggest that you should make future posts explaining each of them as well as you did point# 7. It would benefit a lot of people. I am one of them.

Nice post, and thanks again for the explanation! 

by RichardHayden - 12 months ago
Ashburn, VA United States
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 210

Chessiq - I agree that the inital steps are instantaneous for an experienced player.

 

But the depth with which you process the later steps is a weakness for many players.

 

Take point 7 about what is now unprotected as a consequence of the move and a very simple example: a bishop move from its initial square either directly attacking or pinning a knight to a queen often creates a weakness from whence it came. People often act defensively when faced with such a threat when the best move is often to take the queen out of harms way AND attack the squares that are no longer covered by the bishop.

 

As an example, in the Sicilian Najdorf Poisoned Pawn, Black's queen maneuver is about a lot more than a greedy pawn grab. By playing d4, Bg5, f4, White has created a lot of dark square weaknesses which Qb6 and subsequent moves can exploit.

 

 

by chessiq - 12 months ago
Malawi
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 610

Nice to meet you. Nice post! It is a great list to go through, especially if you are just beginning or you are not very good. If you are good, you can choose your weakest link and try to strengthen it.

I wonder if it's just me... as an experienced player, don't you just "see" all those thing in one swipe across the board? You know what I mean?

by Daemon_Panda - 12 months ago
Coconut Grove , Fl United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 915

Sorry to break the humor bubble but the first list actually works, as a metaphor.

The King is can be seen a car can't he...

food = pieces

things on tv = interesting moves 

by SonofPearl - 12 months ago
Wales
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 2999

Great blog entry!  I totally agree with your outlined thought process.  It's good to have a mental check-list to go through to help decide on a move.  I think that eventually the checks should become automatic, so you don't have to think through each item one at a time.

 

Unfortunately my thought process is much more like your first list.  Funny and true!  

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.