^ Click here to remove ads! ^

Another successful tournament victory!

Submitted by Zenchess on Sat, 04/12/2008 at 10:32pm.

Wow is all I have to say.  I won another local tournament 4-0 to win a $123 prize (it was split for a first place tie and we both got $123).  I played 3 lower-rated players, the highest being a 1600.  However, they were pretty good.  In my first game, I kept building up my position and black was not accomplishing anything useful enough to counter my impending slow kingside buildup. 

 In my second game, I followed the game from a Joshua Waitzkin lecture from chessmaster.  It was a great guide.  My opponent played slightly different from the Joshua lecture game however it went ok and again he was making some moves that were wastes of time and ineffective and so I got some powerful play.  

In my third game, I played a grand prix attack against the sicilian (again), and my opponent received doubled pawns early.  He was still ok but Re8 is not great since if he did move the e-pawn his doubled pawn complex would become vullnerable.  I was trying to combine playing against the potentially weak doubled pawn complex while pursuing the standard Qe1-h4 f5 Bh6 Ng5 attack so typical of the grand prix and many other openings.  YET I made several inaccurate moves (I thought they were nice subtetlies at the time, but there were serious tactical problems and the game started going away from me)

So this is where Joshua Waitzkin's advice comes in handy.  I could have easily 'gave up' and played fast, not playing the best moves, and not putting up a fight.  Instead, I tried my damndest to reverse the situation and I actually managed to get into a somewhat equal bishop vs knight ending (i was probably slightly worse in it).  To my suprise, my opponent took a poisoned pawn and I won a piece for it.  After that the game was fairly easy.  

So my last game.  It was against collin bleak, who is rated 1995.  I was rated 1867 before this tournament.  I played him once before and it was a pretty exciting game, I was worse almost the whole time but hung on till the end and played some suprising moves that almost let me swindle the game. 

So we played again and right off the bat I thought I was doing good in the opening after exchanging bishops on d2.  I don't know the theory of this opening so I can't authoratitively state that but that is what it seemed like at the time.  I played c5, which I thought practically forced e3 and instead he allowed me to trade bishops. 

At first I thought i was crushing him but his move Qf3 (which I did anticipate right beore it) was a great move which seemed to almost completely equalize for him.  I had to match him move for move and so I played Rh2, protecting my queen, and then when he pushed e5, I played Ng4, attacking his e-pawn (the knight couldnt be taken due to a pin, which was neat). 

I thought I was doing great in this position but when he played b5! it started looking sour.  My knight on b8 had nowhere to go!  So I struggled to give my knight a square and he prevented it.  Then I got a little tricky and moved my king to d8.  Actually I thought I could take on c4 next move if he didn't move his knight but then I realized he still had a check on e6 and I would still drop my rook. 

Sooo, he played Rf4.  I then played Ke8.  My little 'blunder' turned out to be incredibly good!  Now his rook was not on the e-file anymore and his knight was blocking his c4 pawns' defense so what that meant was I was getting some freedom!  In the next few moves I had a crushing advantage and I went on to win the game.  Before I got up in material, I had about 5 minutes to his 20.  At the end of the game, I had about 4 seconds to his 50.  At the very end of the game, I had 4 seconds, and he ran out of time (from a hopeless position).  I ALMOST got checkmated by a sneaky rook retreat that threatened mate on the h-file.  I almost fell for it but realized I didn't look at his last move carefully enough and then with almost no time remaining fizzled his mate and then he ran out of time.  

 So beating a 1995 player will surely give me a rating boost.  I guess I'll be around 20 points higher due to that win. 

I have a reputation now as being a tough defender in worse positions.  I think that's a great reputation to have.  *do not give up* unless you are so lost that they can't make any more mistakes.  *do not think you have won a game* unless the game is already over :)   Josh's advice from chessmaster has been instrumental in giving me this attitude of resilience in the face of difficulty and while under pressure. 

And so , for your pleasure, the games:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


» posted in Zenchess's Blog
 

Comments:

by Chesser777 - 35 days ago
Belgium
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 332

In the last game the ratings should be switched =)

Nice games by the way ;-) 


by Zenchess - 2 months ago
Omaha United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 203

  Hello Toby, thanks for your comment.  I will reply to it in a new blog post I will be making a bit later tonight.  I am making a new blog post because I think it's useful enough to be a new entry.  The question "How can I jump from 1600 to 1800" is very interesting for me because I actually just asked this question and eventually found the answer.  I actually got a little higher than 1800 (I am hovering around 1880 right now)  so I know a little too how to reach even higher than just 1600 to 1800.  I recently beat a 1995 in a over the board 90 minute uscf rated game, and my online results have been good as well, though not particularly on this site since I focus on ICC. 

  My approach to chess is very different than what I normally hear.  I mix 2 strange bags, which is that I play 95% speed chess and only an occasional uscf rated tournament (once every month or so or less frequently), and I take a unique approach to studying and playing to improve than what I've heard so far.  

 

 


by TobyHoch - 2 months ago
Leicester United Kingdom
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 2

I've seen a few of your lectures online. I also like Nimzowitsch. I have read his classic instructional book "My System" and also the John Watson reply to this, which was more advanced and not intended for beginners.

 However, I dont really have that much room for chess books where I am living presently and have wanted to see how I can improve using computer programs. I've found a useful way to learn is by trying to solve chess puzzles such as the ones found on this website: http://www.academicchess.org/Games/chessviewer/1000positions.shtml

I'm also a member of what used to be www.worldchessnetwork.com but has since been taken over by internet chess club. I find using the chess engine to examine my online games is a good way to work out how well im doing.

As you can see, im over 1600 but stuck in the grade B and want to learn how I can improve my game so that I can rise to 1800.


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.