Beating the Najdorf (5)

Submitted by Phobetor on Mon, 05/11/2009 at 6:15am.

Below is the fifth game in the Beating the Najdorf series, and this time I beat a Grandmaster! Again, I used the 6. Bg5 variation, and we followed a long theoretical variation where black sacrifices the queen for three minor pieces. At first, I got a very good position with the queen and two rooks, but the advantage slowly slipped away when I made some inaccuracies and black managed to activate his pieces. Just when it turned out I blundered a rook (although it's not easy to see everything) he made two mistakes, allowing me to get a decisive advantage.

Below is the game with annotations.

» posted in Phobetor's Blog
 

Comments:

by josef5555 - 4 months ago
Falköping Sweden
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 139

19.Qxb5 Rb6 is slighty better for black according to Gelfand(Experts vs. the sicilian, second edition).

by tommmas - 5 months ago
Bratislava Slovakia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 7

I like 10. Bxb5 more. for example game Tal-Stean, Hastings 73 or                     Sibarevic-Bukic, Banja Luka 76. Two beautiful games :)

by ChessPaladin2009 - 5 months ago
Westminster United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 62

6. Bg5! has always been one of White's sharpest replies in the Najdorf Variation of the Sicilian Defense.  However, this move is not for whimps!  The game is quite instructive.  It shows exactly what you can expect - very sharp tactical play with endless possibilities in attack - counterattack.  Again, users beware unless you want a real battle on your hands! And I wish people would STOP saying that beginners can even beat GrandMasters with this line -  that's only true if the new player KNOWS  what to do after the initial line of play has been implemented over the board!  If he isn't a student of sharp tactical play and hasn't yet learned how to think 3 or 4 moves ahead to execute combinations - he can forget beating a GrandMaster with this or any other variation! AND THAT IS THE TRUTH!

by Dimitrije_Mandic - 5 months ago
Niš Serbia
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 193

You could also study the famous Bobotsov - Tal game, in which Tal sacrificed his Queen and Knight for two minor pieces, a Rook and a pawn, and achieved an amazing victory!

So, are there any similar Queen sacrifice games (besides Phobetor's given one, Botvinnik - Smyslov and Bobotsov - Tal) of which you know?

by Emad - 5 months ago
Cairo Egypt
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 46

Great game

by gxtmf1 - 5 months ago
Mundelein United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1239
If you like minor piece/ queen trades, study the game Botvinnik-Smyslov 1954 World Champion match (King's Indian Defence, 0-1).
by kerver73 - 5 months ago
Thessaloniki Greece
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1133

Great game....Well done Phobetor...

Can somebody show the variations if black played simply 12..exd5?

It would help me a lot,thanks..

by MarioGabriel - 5 months ago
Zapopan Mexico
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 118

Great game.

Those mistakes from Black were costly indeed!

by gbsalvio - 5 months ago
Araçatuba Brazil
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 16

That line is dubious.. See in http://www.queenalice.com/game.php?id=574490

The sacrifice only drawn..12....Qd4? is incorrect but 12....ed5! is the best move, white has to play weel to try drawn only... 

Best regards from Brasil....

by wilczynski - 5 months ago
Warsaw Poland
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2

I would propose Black to play 12...ed5. Ke8 can escape to the queen side.

Of course, Black situation is not easy but not lost.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
Eindhoven Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1202

Yes, like luis3141 said, 15... Qxb5 is just theory. Among others, Boris Gelfand played it at least once, who has been a 2700+ GM (top 20 of the world) for a long time. So I definetely wouldn't call it a blunder :)

by luis3141 - 5 months ago
Argentina
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 93

As Phobetor already posted, 15.Qxb5 is theory. I have began playing it with black not long ago, so if anyone wants to prove that white is better send me a challenge. Nice game by the way.

by lubo - 5 months ago
Sofia Bulgaria
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 453

Yeap... nothing impressive... I eat GMs for breakfast

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
Eindhoven Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1202

demetrios, then 15... Qc8 16. Bxd7+ Qxd7 (16... Kxd7 17. Nb6+) 17. Nxf6+ wins black's queen for two bishops, which should be winning for white.

by demetrios18 - 5 months ago
new york United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 479

Qc8 saves queen and still puts pressure on king. Also his bishop will have to move. 

by Konstantyn - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 188

Thank you for the answer.

by Phobetor - 5 months ago
Eindhoven Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 1202

Konstantyn, after 18. Qc3+ white wins the rook on h8 so he does have something. After 18... Ke7 19. Bxe6! fxe6 (19... Rg8 20. Rxd6!) 20. Qxh8 white has more than enough compensation for the rook against two bishops. Black's king is not safe and white has a dozen extra pawns.

by Konstantyn - 5 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 188

What if 15...Qa7 instead of the text move?--16.Nf6+Ke717.Bd7 Kf6 and White has nothing. Also 22...Ba6 is an interesting try.Why the GM did not take your Rook on f1? Was he in a time trouble ?

by lubo - 5 months ago
Sofia Bulgaria
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 453

Weeeeeeeell done!

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.