A really interesting game, and enlightening annotation. Thanks.

Well, well, time to tell the story 

Believe it or not, this game was played by one of my team mates, Pierre Agrech, in a local town championship. Pierre is a 20 y.o. strong player, rated 2130 elo. As you can see, even a young fellow can play very nice positional chess. I was very impressed by this game, as I found his dominating play had a nice positional touch like in the games you see in the books.

A 2130 player can play like a master from time to time

Here is the game with my comments and the highlights of "classy moves".

Yeah, I felt like this was an older game as well, perhaps even pre-Soviet chess prominence.

I'm guessing an older game, I don't think modern masters would have their King march away from the action.  Plus the time of resignation was late.

I would guess petrosian on the white side?

I don't think Botvinnik is involved, Reti might be a good guess.

Steve, I agree with you : 13.Nd1! is indeed a classy move, leaving black's exposed bishop in all sorts of trouble.

Development is not that important in the position, as it's fairly closed : what is important is to put the pieces on the right squares.

may be

I guess I'll be the first to open myself up to criticism by much stronger players than myself by giving my thoughts on classy moves. I've no idea who the players might be.

13. Nd1 looks classy to me.  N@c3 doesn't look particularly active with the Black pawn on f5 pretty much ruling out any long term posting on e5.  The bishop on b4 is out of the game, and allowing an exchange on c3 would just help Black. Nd1 prevents the exchange and signals intent to target f5, ultimately forcing Black to weaken his kingside pawn structure by defending the pawn with g6 (in this game).

I think that I would naturally be inclined to develop the c1 bishop at move 13 in this game.  This is almost instinctive, as I have a strong urge to maintain tempo advantage as White and activate my pieces. There isn't an obvious good square for it, but I would probably put it on d2. Here, Nd1 is part of a longer term plan, and it is worth delaying piece development to avoid the exchange on c3. This is why I see it as a classy move. Masters know when to break the "rules" of development.

A common theme I've noticed in master level games is that the minor pieces regularly come back to the first rank early in the game, destined for better squares. I think that this feels unnatural to the majority of even fairly strong players. To me, this demonstrates the importance of having a plan and making moves consistent with it.  I've found GM Dzindzichasvili's video lessons very instructive in this regard, even though I'm sure he'd wince at most of my games...

WELL atleast tell us who is it?

My guess is Botvinnik as white

i'm not sure , but look like one of my games;)

you look like kramnik

Its part one in the several step plan on how to play like him

No, it's not one of my games. But thank you for this flattering comparison (unless you thought I was on the black side, of course )

possibly its one of ur games

It can be Botvinnik couse he like English game, let me guess it Botvinnik versus Tall, maybe i was wrong, but it is an awesome game,though.

petrosian? capablanca? murphy? Many possibilities but a great game overall

I think Richard Reti and Alexander Alekhine, Richard Reti white.

but of course I'm wrong :P

EDIT: Actually, its probably Richard Reti and Jose Capablanca, Reti white.

I'm pretty sure that Richard Reti is white, its just black im having trouble guessing... probably Capablanca though.

May be - young Fischer or Capablanka ?!