Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Fighting out of the E Class. My first year of OTB. Part 1

My goal for learning chess in 2009 was to break 1200 in the USCF rating system. So I thought I'd write a little bit about my intro to chess and what has helped me the most. Part 1 is about losing. Part 2 will highlight the things I believe have helped me the most. 

I had never played a rated OTB game in my life until sitting down against Shan Siddiqi in the first ever Knights tournament at the CCSCSL.  The Knights tournament is monthly tournament where players gather every Wednesday night and each month a winner qualifies to play in the CCSCSL Club Championship.

Before the match started club employees assured me it wouldn’t be so bad, gave me pointers on notation, basic do’s and don’ts of tournament play and etiquette. All of which pretty much went over my head.

 I was in a losing position by the 4th or 5th move.  I wouldn't have even been able to tell you what a "losing position" was last year. I didn't know what the "Sicilian" was, a "Ruy Lopez" I don't think I'd ever performed and en passant capture and I definitely didn't you know the touch move rule.

This was my first experience taking notation and playing with a clock.

 That was August 2008, and the experience was incredible. An eye opening 30 minutes when I knew that I knew nothing and was excited about the possibilities of learning chess.   

 My first victory in OTB chess was a quick rated game in the CCSCSL Friday night Quads. This little kid, probably 8 or 9 blundered his way out of a winning position right in front of his dad. Winning that game didn’t feel good at all.

Really though, studying Chess and playing OTB was like entering an abusive relationship. It was like meeting a new girlfriend who punches you in the face before and after each date. You love it but it causes bruises. 

I left gameknot for Chess.com, became an annual member of the Chess Club and Scholastic Center Saint Louis. Began a really undisciplined, still very much so, initial investigation into the Sicillian, Ruy Lopez, 4 knights but never really got a grasp on any of them.

Every trip to the Chess Club, for blitz, or classical tournaments was a trip to another beating.

I ended my provisional rating period with a whopping 849! I lost a lot of games but had a brief break from the constant thrashing in the rating based “Thanks for Chess” after the 2008 Thanksgiving holiday. I came close to winning my section losing in the final round when I blundered my queen away. That was a highlight of my first year winning a “brilliancy prize” for a Ruy Lopez game with the white pieces. The game was published in the MCA bulletin and that felt great! 

Anyway, I have lost a lot of games over the last year. A lot of games and even though I know I 'll keep losing with the occasional win here or there my confidence is going up and my knowledge of the game is increasing. 
Part 2 to come soon. 

Comments


  • 3 years ago

    Blunderprone

    Her name is Caissa and she's a very demanding mistress. She'll kick you when you are down and throw tantrums when you threaten to put her away. You will lose sleep over her. You will wish you never met her.  But... when you really look past the fits, you will find her true beauty through the art that she brings into your life. This is what will keep you coming back for more.

    At your level, your first name should be tactics, your middle name is tactics and your last name is tactics.  Get training on some basic one move poisitions daily like practicing free throws in basketball. You'll find that tactics is like giving Caissa a bouquet of flowers.

  • 3 years ago

    qixel

    I spent some time using GoogleMaps to zoom around the CCSCSL neighborhood.  It is very nice.  Streets like that just do not exist in California.  Unfortunately the Google street view of the Center is old and shows a business that apparently was previously in that location (possibly a cafe or restaurant?)

    It would be hard to live in that area and not play chess constantly !

    Amy

  • 3 years ago

    CristianoCorreia

    nice article. you are better then 1100

    i now a lot of openning principles but some times i play weak moves on the openning. So for a basic intermediate player i recommend The ABC of opennings by Andrew Martin. "Open Games, Semi-Open Games, Closed and Semi- Closed Games, Flank and Irregular Openings. Invaluable advice is given about what to look for and how to play each specific category, and the instruction is enhanced by the use of recent, thematic master games to compliment this advice. General instruction about how to play the opening is also included."

  • 3 years ago

    Skeptikill

    Scarblac "Sad to read that you spend time on openings. They're a complete waste of time for you."

     

    scarblac its like growing up! You dont know why it was a good idea or bad idea to take certain paths in life, but then after when your older and wiser you understand why they are but then its too late.

    OPening theory is important to an extent but should not be concentrated on too much by beginners as it is the other middle and endgame which is where they make all their mistakes mainly. As he is 1600 on this site i presume he has some handle on chess at this stage, but its a good idea to not get bogged down with it.

  • 3 years ago

    Skeptikill

    nice article. its nice to see passionate players. i lived breathed chess in my earlier years. 

    Not sure if anyone mentioned any other move sequences but one that jumped into my mind was 

    20. BxPf6  if Qf8 then QxPh7#

    and any other loses except 20. ...Qd7

    and then 21. Rad1

    As i look at it on the analysis board it isnt as instant winning as i thought. lol

    Well  played anyways

  • 3 years ago

    Bjarkoff

    Very nice article, thanks.

  • 3 years ago

    Webhead

    Nice article and great game.  Keep up the work, it will pay off.

  • 3 years ago

    PhilipN

    Don't worry about memorizing lots of opening lines at your level, just play stuff that leads to the kinds of games that you like to play (such as open, tactical games or slow, maneuvering games).  I like to play obscure variations of the Sicilian, and then go on intuition (although I've never played official OTB chess--I'd love to have the opportunity).  Don't take this as advice, as I'm lower-rated on Chess.com than you are at this time.

  • 3 years ago

    greasyfingers

    A very nice combination and a great article.

  • 3 years ago

    strani

    To the gentlemen who felt sad because I studied some openings, 

    It was a great pleasure to start studying some openings, so please don't feel bad about it. I enjoyed it, I really did and don't consider the pleasure of learning about them a waste of time at all. 

    Thanks everyone again for reading and I'll be posting part 2 over the weekend.

  • 3 years ago

    serexl

    Thanks for sharing!

  • 3 years ago

    Ballinlough

    Nice work Sean and a good read.

  • 3 years ago

    TiffanyC

    Thanks for sharing..I have one opening as white and two as black and when those break down I go to the basics..center pawns, then knights, bishops, castle and rooks to the center. As black I hunker down and let my opponent bring the game to me.

    Tiff !!

    PS I don't punch my boy friend in the face before 'AND' after a date.  Innocent

  • 3 years ago

    staggerlee

    Thanks for sharing your experiences!

  • 3 years ago

    hicetnunc

    First congrats for playing OTB : that's the real thing and not every Internet player has the guts to make the step ! Cool

    Second, I really enjoyed your prize-winning game : you certainly played well above 850 elo during this game.

    Nice reading about your experiences, and good luck on your way up Smile

  • 3 years ago

    hawkeye03

    "Really though, studying Chess and playing OTB was like entering an abusive relationship. It was like meeting a new girlfriend who punches you in the face before and after each date. You love it but it causes bruises."


    Classic!  Great article.

  • 3 years ago

    mufasah123

    I know exactly how you feel mate.  i am in that position (no pun intended) now myself.  I had known how to play chess for years, but i only started competitively last year, when i joined a chess club.  My first tourney was a scholastic, and i ended up going 2 and 4.  I learned a lot, and in the next two tourneys i ended up going 1 and 4, with a lot of close games with players much higher rated than i was.  I disagree with you about beating kids, though.  In my last tournament, i did not face anyone over the age of twelve, and three out of the five opponents were of the scary Indian variety.  These were people who actually put time into studying openings beyond three moves, and bought actual in depth chess books.  They were also the kind of people that go into uber fast chess tactic/problem discussion with anyone who happens to be around them before the match (annoyingly seemingly arrogant, though they probably weren't stopped by their parents, so they might not know any better).  It feels good to take their arrogance down a peg.  Unfortunately, the parents are always watching, and they generally talk to each other about how i am stronger than my rating and warning their kids about me, thus decreasing the chance that my opponent might be lulled into a false sense of security.

  • 3 years ago

    Scarblac

    Sad to read that you spend time on openings. They're a complete waste of time for you.

  • 3 years ago

    strani

    Thanks everyone for reading and commenting.

    Michael, very kind of you to say so, the Siccilian is actual the main reason I dreaded playing 1.e4, the massive amount of theory I faced in higher rated opponents was absolutely terrifying. I played a lot of 1.f4 for better or worse but I'm saving all of that for part 2!


    Sean

  • 3 years ago

    MikyZ

    Hallo Sean,

     

    I really enjoy reading Your articles. There's a lot of "heart blood" in them (can You say this in English, it's quite literally translated from the German word "Herzblut").

    Your game was great fun. Never have seen such a strong 849. Felt more like a 1500+!

    If I were You, I would drop the Sicilian for a while. There are simply too many possibilities to change the way the game goes from both sides (each change in the pawn structure is important) of the board. I often play the Alapin as white, which might not be the best opening choice but gives me a surplus in the opening knowledge in most of my games and dropped the Sicilian as black in favor of the French or even e5, where is much less theory to learn to get a feeling of what You are actually doing. At least in my opinion.

     

    Sincerely

     

    Michael

Back to Top

Post your reply: