Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Inside a book (1) Modern chess tactics (I), Ludek Pachman

In our club there is a great book collection of chess. No matter their age - from any years to more than a century, it is needed to be care in some cases -, language maybe a temporal problem to translate the comments (I don't understand german, for example), but these books are a great treasure, no doubt! Smile

Mmm... really they are? Is licit to ask ourselves a critical question... some of these books - any of them from XIX century! - are really a "practical" option for a training, for example? Undecided

In other words: it will be more appropiate turn on the computer and databases or take an insight to modern publications? They are a lot of magazines of various languages too...

Last week, seeing the vaste library in a free-time between trainings, I feel an odd sensation... I have learned - and advanced - in chess thanks to many of these books!

Yes, I spent my time solving tactic positions, reading about openings, seeing the best tournaments of chess history, maybe even I have read about any people who is here today... with some of them Embarassed 

As anyone knows there are always interesting things inside a book. So, in his calm silence, my computer agrees with me to pay tribute to these fellow team members... 

And what was at the beginning? No, please, no order... choose freely! Ok, anyway in my beginnig I had... Modern chess tactics (I and II), written by Czeschoslovakian grandmaster Ludek Pachman. 

 

We will see any position which refresh my "historic" memory. Even today I find these tactical resources really valuables Wink Ok, come on inside!

This position appears in page 18 of the above cited book. 

White want to play Be3-d4, taking the great diagonal, in a good opportunity. But first they must defend d5 pawn. It is no possible with c3-c4 because Rb8 could take b4 pawn. So, Bb3 and after Be3-d4 is the idea. 

Black hound this pawn with

21... Qf7! 22.Be3 Nf6! 23.Bb3 Bb7 Just in time! Now the game continued 24.Rd1 and, after a little tactic tricks, black eventually won. But Pachman comments an interesting variation:

24.c4 Bc8! (menacing b4 pawn) 25.Bd2 Ne4 26.Be1 Qf6, and black pieces have returned to their initial position! Surprised

At this moment Pachman ends the analysis, saying a great true: white bishop have not reached d4 square...

We will see this variation, and possible best moves, with comments:


First time I saw next position was in this book and I got very surprised. 

 

An incredible position, which remembers a wild Alekhine opening in "the match of the century" - the World's championship Spasski-Fischer - in 1972. It is black turn, what's the correct move? Undecided

Fischer played 24... Qg1+? and after 25.Kd2 black queen could be taken... with check! So, after any moves black resigned...

Pachman comments an interesting possibility. 24... Rf4! and other piece is participating in the attack, menacing:

1) 25... Rxe4+ or the real idea 

2) 25... Rg4-g1+.

But what if 25.Bf1 Qg1, threating to take the bishop with check with Qxf1+, because the queen can not be eaten (Rh1 will be chekmate)?

Well... the wonderful solution that Pachman found is... to ignore it!! Surprised

In a "crazy" way, white turn your face to the queenside - and that knight - playing "with relax" 26.dxc6!! and now:

a) 26... Qxf1+ 27.Kd2! Rxf2+ 28.Ke3!, winning. If someone make you a check, to take this piece is not the single alternative! :-)

b) On the other hand 26... Rxe4+ gives to white a great compensation for the queen: 27.Kd2 Rxf2+ 28.Kc3 Rxc2+ 29.Kxc2.

Obviously Pachman have not an engine inside a computer... and logically he made mistakes. He was human, after all! Smile  Merit is even more great, I think.

Ok, but how a lot of combinations reveal, any details show many steps to the solution! We know that:

a) white survives because they have enough compensation for the queen and

b) it occurs because the Nc6 is taken... so...

24... exd5! 25.exd5 Ne7! 26.Bf1 Qg1! was the correct way, to take the Bf1, and black will win the game. 

After this first move white could play 25.Qxc6, but Qg1+ 26.Kd2 Qxf2+, and the bishop on b2 will be out of the board...   

We can see the analysis:


Next diagram - page 76 - shows a beautiful ending for a tactical position, using the "stair" (as I think is naming it).

A task which is not easy to make, because one great move (very difficult to see, or it was for me in that time... Foot in mouth) may get that black draws! 


As he said before, this book was recommended for training our tactics - me and my brother -. So, finishing the chapter about a topic - columns and seven rank, for example - we found games in relation with it and exercises. 

Any exercises are difficult, sure, but always was possible to see the solutions, no? Well, the answer is noooooo!! Laughing

If any analysis had mistakes and a solution requires it... bufff At any moments, it could be surrealistic. For example, let see one of them:

 
- Mmm... white play and win, George! Cool
- Ok, give me a while... Tongue out
- a while... Undecided
- a while... Frown
- a while Cry

I was not a great tactician - now neither - but, after take a "deep" insight to 1.Rg7+ Kh8 2.Nf8
 
black don't capture the rook, playing to the counter-attack:
2... Te1+ and now:

a) 3.Kf2 Re2+ may be terrible if white goes with 4.Kf3?? Ra3+ 5.Kf4 Rf2 checkmate! If not checks until the eternity...

b) 3.Kg2 Rxa2+ 4.Kf3 Bd5+ 5.Kf4 Rf2++

So, if the problem was the lateral checks with Ra8 I found an excellent move - or I think so -, treating really Rg7+ and Nf8!! After it, it will be a play to make checkmate with two rooks...

This move was 1.a4!! ,closing the a-column if black capture with b-pawnbut I found that white was not winning yet! Unhappy, I ran to the solution... but it only have the final of the game! Yell 

Jeje, the game ended with 1.a4!! bxa3?? 2.Rg7+ Kh8 3.Nf8! and black resigned. But 1... Rae8! or even 1... f4! must be more strong moves. Playing very careful white could achieve a draw... and thanks. Cool

Finally, in my "openings preparation" - if it was a sort of this - a saw in other book by Pachman - the sicilian opening - a cute line to play with black. I was about to play when... agggggg Surprised there was an intermediate-devastating move!

You can see the line:


Now the book comment 9.f3 Qxa8!, with any compensation for the exchange(no problem with it, Topalov forgot a lot of rooks at this way! Tongue out ) or 9.Bf3 Nxf3+ 10.Nxf3 Qa8! with similar results.

But it is not gold all that sparkle, and fortunately I found

9.Bc6+!!
and black are completely losing. Uff!! Innocent

Ok, I hope you like this article, and maybe even is possible you can read this book, which before, now and after this article will continue being a jewel.


Thanks for your time, have a nice week! Laughing

Comments


  • 2 years ago

    george1977

    Yes, gott69, it was crazy: one "on index" author and all your books gone with him...

    And I suppose it was not possible any single exception, obviously :-S

    Ok bills1943, good luck with the bishops in your games! ;-)

  • 2 years ago

    Bills1943

    Thanks for setting me staight on Packman vs. Fischer never seen the bishop but that is my problem in many games I play.

  • 2 years ago

    gott69

    Only one notice.

    L. Pachman was emigated from Czechoslovakia socialistic republik and his books was "on index" (prohibited). It was crazy, that this  apolitical book was loanining  and studying  only in private.   

  • 2 years ago

    Omganesha

    Cool. Thanks.

  • 2 years ago

    george1977

    Yes, I think the same: showing the masters plans in middlegames, endgames and even openings, these books have became "classics" too...

    Very interesting - and precise, I think - your last comment! -->

    "The hardest skill to assimilate when studying chess is that a player must become successful at blending all the skills of a chess game against a wily opponent into a flexible whole game plan. That's what I learned from his books and keep improving on."

  • 2 years ago

    diagonal

    His strategy books are good if you want to study whole game chess planning and styles of maneuvering because all player need to learn about the rules of chess, then keep improving in maneuvering both side of the board in opening, middle, and endgame to play winning chess. The hardest skill to assimilate when studying chess is that a player must become successful at blending all the skills of a chess game against a wily opponent into a flexible whole game plan. That's what I learned from his books and keep improving on. 

  • 2 years ago

    george1977

    Thanks, grafman and davidmelbourne :-) All learn and nothing else matters, as Metallica said in the song...

    Yes, diagonal, I read these books time ago (I and II, I remember), but I don't know where I put them! :-S I think a friend ask me about them and after it... bye :-(

    What do you think about the Pachman's strategy books? I think the books of tactics was a better collection, but it is only my thought.

  • 2 years ago

    diagonal

    Have you read and studied L.Pachman's "Complete Chess Strategy: First Principles of Middle Game" books 1, 2, and 3?

  • 2 years ago

    davidmelbourne

    Lowcki vs. Tartakower - beautiful!! thanks for that:)

  • 2 years ago

    Grafman

    Nice article... enjoyed and learn something!!!

    Thankz

  • 2 years ago

    george1977

    Yes, bills1943, white have Bf1! :-)

  • 2 years ago

    Bills1943

    I read your article and found the game between Pachman vs. Fischer Santiago 1959 a little confusing? All black had to do is move Rh1#. Am I missing something?

  • 2 years ago

    george1977

    Yes, Sang Wogi, Pachman is a "classic"! :-) 

    He write books about openings too, but I don't remember now "The english opening"... It is possible the plan with 12.Kh1, was followed by Rg1 and g4 in Fischer style? I think you are saying that... oh, what past times!!

    I wonder myself how Pachman joined such volume of information... ufff

  • 2 years ago

    SanWogi

    Pachman is a real classic! I once had the opportunity to study some variations of the English Opening from a Pachman book together with a friend. We spent midnight hours on that book wondering why moves like 12. Kh1! got an exclamation mark, when we didn't expect that move at all. So.. Pachman is great! 

  • 2 years ago

    msoewulff

    there isnt another mate quite like back rank mate.

  • 2 years ago

    george1977

    I think the same, msoewulff, and I believe that 36... Qe4!! is the key of this known tactical topic.

  • 2 years ago

    george1977

    No, Anlamk, unfortunately for me I write directly in english, but I have never study this language... :( 

    Ok, I have read a lot of research articles - more about science, geopolitical topics and history -, making my own translations with a dictionary on my hand, but no more.

    So, my apologies if what I have written is not correct (aside of chess), I don't use any translation tool and I suppose it is a great handicap.

    To write in spanish will be very easy for me, is evident, and I know is sad to think in a new translation of these articles to people who speak spanish - many of my Facebook friends, for example - when I don't have more time.

    But chess comments, diagrams, variations are there too :-) An advantage and a disadvantage...

  • 2 years ago

    msoewulff

    love the tartakower example

  • 2 years ago

    AnlamK

    Do you write your blog entries in Spanish and then translate them using an online translation tool?

Back to Top

Post your reply: