On Computers

Submitted by aareyes06 on Thu, 07/17/2008 at 11:55am.

Computer chess programs are increasingly becoming a big part of  the everyday player's experience.  They are great in many respects, but some caution should be exercised.

First, chess engines are great training tools.  There is much to learn and improve upon with their help.  It's like having a very strong player right there whenever you need one.  Positions can be thought on for as long as possible and some engines can be tailored to an individuals playing strength.  This is beneficial for the beginner to novice primarily because they will not be able to compete against a very strong engine effectively, and thus, will benefit far more by having a more managable challenge.  Not to mention it will help their morale. 

Next, these programs with their massive storage capabilities are great for organizing games and ideas as they come up.  One can easily store their games and review them later; adding analysis as it comes along.  This helps the learning process by consolidating all the information in one area.  For example, ideas found in books, magazines or from others, can all be kept organized very easily and it is always a click or two away. 

These are but a few reasons to invest some money and a lot of time with your favorite chess program.  However, there are a few considerations that should be thought on carefully in order to maintain steady improvement and progress.  The first is to always remember that you must be doing the learning.  If you insist on having the computer do the real work for you, then you are cheating yourself out of great opportunities.  Second, don't place too high a premium on being able to "beat" the computer.  Again, you want to improve your game.  There have been times when I have destroyed players who claim to have beaten their computer; however, their play was not impressive.  Lastly, explore all the possible things your engine is capable of doing and find those that help you the most, but don't ignore the others.  Keep challenging the weak points in your play. 

And don't forget...have fun! 

 

Blessings,

aareyes06


» posted in aareyes06's Blog
 

Comments:

by aareyes06 - 16 months ago
San Antonio, Texas United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 20

Howdy StarJock!

Thanks for your post.  I do not have any examples of a comp falling into a trap...surely they will not when set on their max ability. 

Your second question is a good one.  Computer programs do have weaknesses; however, they are not ones that we lesser mortals can take advantage of.  The biggest weakness lies in the computer's ability to calculate possibilites.  Because they are set to analyse a particular position based on a mathematical algorithm (based on the numerical values of pieces) they can calculate tactical variations and opening lines very well.  However, we know that throughout the course of a game the relative values of the pieces could change based on strategical considerations.  High level players can understand these subtleties and make the right moves accordingly.  But it is much more difficult to program a computer to make intuitive positional judgements, when it is not designed for those purposes.  Therefore, if you want to be successful against a computer, choose imbalanced, no-technical positions that make the computer's task a lot harder. 

~aareyes06


by StarJock - 16 months ago
Phoenix, Arizona United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 197

Does anyone have some examples that they can reference, or show, where a pc computer program, such as Fritz, will give the wrong move or fall into a trap, such as a Queen sac.?

What are the weaknesses of modern day pc computer programs (if any)?


 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.