Positional Sacrifices

Submitted by xMenace on Wed, 01/07/2009 at 8:48am.

According to Wikipedia there are three basic types of sacrifices: Attack on the King, Development, and Strategic/Positional. The Positional Sacrifice is considered teh most difficult of the three: In a general sense, the aim of all true sacrifices is to obtain a positional advantage. However, there are some speculative sacrifices where the compensation is in the form of an open file or diagonal or a weakness in the opponent's pawn structure, and it is not even clear how this might potentially be turned into something more tangible. These are the hardest sacrifices to make; they require deep strategic understanding.

I have made precious few of these over my career. In fact, I can't recall any specific games over my some 300 OTB forays.

Recently though, I played a higher rated player and found myself in a strategically better position where a sacrifice kind of presented itself. I really had no clear plan for bring home the bacon, but it felt right on so many levels. I had to do it!

Enjoy!

 

 

References: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrifice_(chess)

» posted in xMenace's Blog
 

Comments:

by xMenace - 8 months ago
Rothesay, NB Canada
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 846

Yes, d4 would have taken us into QGD Tarrasch territory which i was prepared for. d3 is cramping and ended up playing a big part of enabling me to attack with such leisure.

by bobbereight - 8 months ago
Madison, WI United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 164

well, white allowed black to equalize easily in the opening (I know that's not the reason of the post, but I must mention it). 3.cxd5 is a mistake unless it is immediately followed by 4. d4 (for an exchange QGD).

I played a game like this that my coach (a master) reviewed, and this is the one of the thinks I learned in that game.... believe it or not, I sacrificed the exchange in that game (which could have been considered positional since I owned the light squares) and set up a very pretty mating net.

by CookDrew - 9 months ago
Alabama United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 41

Nice, very instructive post.

by greatexcalibur - 9 months ago
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 2440

Nice game!

by xMenace - 9 months ago
Rothesay, NB Canada
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 846

Trying to keep my games down right now. Got two round 2's about to start which will be tough, and I have some work work to concentrate on.

by JoesephScott - 9 months ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 55

Instead of Nxf2 (which is at least even with very active play on Black's part after 19. Bxc8 Rxc8 20. Kxf2 c4+ 21. e4 c3 22. Nf3 cxb2 23. Qxb2 bxa3 24. Qa2 ), 18. f4 leaves a comfy advantage.

20 ... Ng4 is a little stronger.

Still, exciting play.  After seeing that, I'd like to play a quick game or two, if you are up for it.

by pusaandfink - 9 months ago
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 35

Nice game. And cool sac. :)

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.