rook endgames are not easy!

Submitted by mauerblume on Thu, 11/05/2009 at 3:39am.

"It is an error to think, that rook endgames are easy to play!"

Victor Kortschnoi

 

1. A basic rook endgame

The following diagram is is a basic rook endgame, everyone should know. 

 

 

So we see: When the black king keeps moving between g7 and h7 , every thing is o.k!

 

2. Another drawish position

 

 

 

So do you think, white can win this position?

To decide this question we should allow white to reach his ideal position. The best position he can reach, when black makes nothing

 

 

 

***

Now keep these both more or less basic rook endgames and look at following position


 

 

It is a position from an OTB-game I played 2 weeks ago against a Dutch FM.

In time trouble I had made an error, but instead of resigning I had played on and at the end I reached that position.

Here I thought it would be enough now and I resigned. And my opponent thanked, obviously  convinced of a deserving the victory.

At that moment another player walked by and said:" This is a draw!"

***

Naturally he was right! Make a synthesis of the first both examples and you have it!


 

 

What was the FM`error?

He could have reached following position :


 

 

This would presumely a winning position. Why? Because the white king can hide at b7

***

And the moral of this story:

"Study rook endgames! They are not so easy, as they may look at first sight!"

 

 


» posted in mauerblume's Blog
 

Comments:

by oinquarki - 18 days ago
The Finest City In The United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 3750

This blogpost provides an excellent opportunity to earn my degree in journalism.

 

"It is an error to think" - Victor Kortschnoi Laughing

by kunduk - 18 days ago
kolkata India
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 862

good.. i liked it..

by mauerblume - 18 days ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5537

"The endgame university" written from Mark Dworetzki is a good book to understand better the principles of endgames

by KanetsuStar - 18 days ago
d Spain
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 130

I suck at endgames. Any way I can improve them other than playing lots of games to see if one reaches the endgame?

by Safinim - 19 days ago
Benevento Italy
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 292

Thank you!!

by amitprabhale - 20 days ago
Mumbai India
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 252

Fntastic post pls post more positions

by mooro-gates - 24 days ago
Cairo Egypt
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 148

Thanks a lot! Now, I should start a new way of thinking Smile

by Catalyst_Kh - 24 days ago
Kharkov Ukraine
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 1096

Rook endgames are the most beautiful of all, especially when there are a lot of pawns left. The second place take endgames with bishops of opposite colour and with many pawns left - that is important condition, with many pawns this ending became very complex and tricky, many beautiful 'combinations' hiding there. And if the ending has bishops of opposite colour plus rooks and plus many pawns - that is true beauty and art, almost any ending like that hides bright brilliances!

 

And the most boring endgames are knight endgames. Smile

by mauerblume - 24 days ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5537

Yes, Sastry,I agree! 

Especially the knowledge of standard endgame positions is very helpful to evaluate and play endgames,- or even middle games -, better

by Sas3 - 24 days ago
Hyderabad India
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 1876

Thanks Heinrich. A valuable lesson indeed. I am now finding myself increasingly at "end-game" disadvantage despite early gains and entering the end-game with a pawn extra. I analyzed a recent draw with Lynn and the computer said I should've won!!

Clearly, "regular analysis" is not quite enough in end-game study. Much practice and complete understanding of standard end-game positions is very much the need.

by mauerblume - 24 days ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5537

Thanks!- I have removed it, because it was not possible to correct it

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.