Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Study Materials

Reading Nimzovich's My System in 1998 was a setback for me.  It led me to think I could be like Nimzovich and play strange moves and invent my own style of chess.  What brought me success later was a mindset of conformity--conformity to sound principles and standard patterns of development and movement. 

A better study material was Yasser Seirawan's Pro Chess Video Set.  He gave me a sense of confidence and the ability to formulate strong plans.  Unfortunately, I don't know where to get those videos now.

When it comes to chess books, there is a glut of opening books and too few about endgames.  You should focus on endgames if you want to improve.  Grandmasters are really at fault for writing too few endgame books.

Jeremy Silman's Complete Endgame Course is a good book.  Silman is an excellent writer.  He tailors the material according to playing strength so just flip from the beginning until you are mystified by something and read forward from there. 

Glenn Flear's Practical Endgame Play: Beyond the Basics is not as good.  Flear does not give enough explanations.  I was left wondering what I had paid for.

Update (2011):

Thank you alex walsh for your suggestions.  I have Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual on CD ROM and Nunn's Secrets of Rook Endings and they are both excellent.  I also recently bought Nunn's Chess Endings Vol 1 and 2.  

Looking back at what I said about Flear's book, I was too harsh.  Actually I was excited by Flear's concept of NQEs because I have wanted coverage of that subject for a long time.  In fact, Flear's book makes a sort of Vol 3 to Nunn's recent series.  The books are the same dimensions so they sit nicely on my shelf together.

Comments


  • 20 months ago

    samredway

    I agree that study of the endgame is absolutely vital. I think it is best to study end games on the computer. On here using the chess mentor there are several excellent endgame courses which have really helped me and you can practice specefic positions with the computer workout. As to whether endings are more important than openings? Well probably not, I mean you have to get to the ending right? A lot of games finish in the mid game!! But if you like slow openings like say 4 knights and play a solid positional middle game, then I guess you would have to win that in the ending every time.... I suppose it comes down to style and taste.

     

    However I will say. If you dont understand endings it is hard to play a good mid game if only because aside from mating your opponent how can you formulate a winning plan if you dont know what a winning endgame is to aim for?

     

    Good enddgame definitely seperates the 'real' serious player from the mess around payer who will never get above basic club level play.

  • 3 years ago

    ghostofmaroczy

    http://www.chess.com/article/view/an-anti-sicilian-try

    In this article by Silman, in the response to Mr Jeong, in the second paragraph, Silman writes "It's not a personal decision."  This is what I mean by conformity.  The position calls for certain things to be done and you must do them.

  • 3 years ago

    alex_walsh

    Dvoretsky's engame manual is excellent. Besides that, there is an 3 volume (I think three volume) set by Averbach which comes highly recommended by Dvoretsky. However, I keep hearing that computers have completely changed the field of endgames, since they can verify or contradict our opinions. For example, Nunn put out a book called secrets of rook endings, which IS the every rook ending with something like a rook and pawn vs a rook- so there are materials out there that can give you a definitive course. Hope this helps and adds to your thoughts. In support of your claim, Lasker, Capablanca, and Karpov are just some of many who claim that the endgame should be studied before all else. Lasker and Capa hardly studied the openings.

Back to Top

Post your reply: