Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The 545 People Responsible for All of America's Woes

I was reading this the other day, and thought it rather relevant.  Also, most folks are clueless as to where the power really is, who wields it, and why they do so.

It's an article from Charlie Reese, who wrote for the Orlando Sentinel for 30+ years.  I hope you like it, that it will give you food for thought, and possibly incite you to action... 


The 545 People Responsible for All of America's Woes

by Charley Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don't write the tax code. Congress does. You and I don't set fiscal policy. Congress does. You and I don't control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president and nine Supreme Court justices — 545 human beings out of the 235 million — are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank.

I excluded all but the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.

No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislation's responsibility to determine how he votes.

A CONFIDENCE CONSPIRACY

Don't you see how the con game is played on the people by the politicians? Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of Tip O'Neill, who stood up and criticized Ronald Reagan for creating deficits.

 

The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating appropriations and taxes.

O’Neill is the speaker of the House. He is the leader of the majority party. He and his fellow Democrats, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto.

REPLACE SCOUNDRELS

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 235 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility.

I can't think of a single domestic problem, from an unfair tax code to defense overruns, which is not traceable directly to those 545 people.

When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in Lebanon, it's because they want them in Lebanon.

There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take it.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exist disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation" or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people and they alone are responsible. They and they alone have the power. They and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses — provided they have the gumption to manage their own employees.

This was written in September 1985.

Comments


  • 8 months ago

    angelor

    I am copying this to send everywhere. Well written, concise and to the point. And most of all correct. Now I know why she wouldn't let me run for alderman. Politics corrupts even good individuals!

  • 13 months ago

    JimEBau

    Exactly my point.  Here in these USofA, we're actually a Republic, with a Federal system, taking on the guise of a democracy, in that the democratic process is loosely followed in elections (thank God for the Electoral College).

    Crazychessplaya, I appreciate your interest and your sincerity.  I apologize for any offense that I may have given.  I realized that a few of my blog posts that I wanted you to reference are not on this site, but are up on my Blogger site.  If you have a chance to read just one, this one should summarize my view/stance: http://jimebau.blogspot.com/2005/01/real-issue-in-america.html.

    Also, one of my suggestions for a solution is that everyone in the country vote for the other guy in the next three elections.  We have elections every two years, and each cycle, all of the Representatives, and 1/3 of the Senators are affected by the vote (Rep. = 2-year term, Sen. = 6-year term).  If Americans voted for the other guy for the next three cycles, in six years, I believe that ALL three branches, expecially Congress, would get the idea.  Either they do what the Constitution, and what the people elected them to do, or they get the boot.  I think this would be a highly effective way to get the message across.  Of course, I've written this in one of my blogs already, but can't remember which one.

    Anyway, I'm out for the W/E, so I'll see what else pops up in here when I return Monday night.  God bless, and have a good W/E.

  • 13 months ago

    Crazychessplaya

    "(...) politicians, who, once ensconsed in power, behave (in general) as if their main goal is re-election and that they will do anything they can to ensure it (...)"

    Just wanted to dwell a bit more on this excellent observation.

    It should be obvious to any student of Democracy as a political system, that the purpose of Democracy is to allow individuals to express their wishes through representatives. For example, a group of voters wants to get a law passed or a policy implemented, they elect a representative among themselves who, once elected (voted into the office), will strive to have the desire of the voters transformed into law, a policy etc. Thus, it goes even without saying, that the purpose of a representative in a Democratic society is to represent the voters.

    Meanwhile, just as RetGuvvie98 mentioned, there do exist politicians who have failed to understand the concept of representation. Once elected, they represent themselves only, not the voters who voted for them. An individual with the initials J.L. comes into mind when considering American politics, but the problem is common accross the globe. What is really bothering me, is the voters' acceptance of such a state of affairs.

  • 13 months ago

    RetGuvvie98

    It appears that "articles of confederation" are not a nation's constitution, that a constitutional convention was called to create a constitution for a single NATION, not a confederation of unique 'states' or - as you term them, "individual colonies as independent nations"

     

    thus re-defining a term - constitution - to mean 'articles of confederation has resulted in you appearing to attack the OP's point.

     

    yes, the sad fact is that we, in this country seem to elect the most highly skilled liars as our politicians, who, once ensconsed in power, behave (in general) as if their main goal is re-election and that they will do anything they can to ensure it, even to the destruction of the nation in the long-run.

     

    other countries have their problems as well.

    sadly, those also reflect the baseness of human nature.

          The founding fathers of this country had some good ideals and ideas - and incorporated them into the constitution.  Unfortunately, that great document has been gradually 'modified' (corrupted if you will) into something far different than the originalists intended.

     

    observations above, and opinions of the poster, not representing site management in any respect.

  • 13 months ago

    Crazychessplaya

    I enjoyed your response, but still have a few minor points of disagreement.

    First, I am certain that the current US Constitution is in fact the second  constitution your country ratified. The first constitution, generally known as the Articles of Confederation, was ratified by the 13 original colonies between the years 1777 and 1781. The Articles of Confederation essentially treated the individual colonies as independent nations, where "each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated."

    In effect your first constitution (i.e. The Articles of Confederation) did not call into being a nation called the United States. Each state governed itself as an independent nation. All this was reversed by the second and final Constitution, ratified in 1788. The point is that the Articles of Confederation were a massive failure, and the 1788 Constitution that replaced them was vastly different (although, as you mention, it was drafted mostly by the same people). I simply want to be exact as to the cause and effect of the earliest American legislative acts.

    Just to make sure about the flag, I am a Polish citizen, never had any interest in changing my status. The reason I comment in your blog is that the subject matter is very fascinating to me, as the issue of accountability of the politicians  is important in all countries, it seems. I find it strange that so few Americans respond to your ideas.

    I apologize for the last paragraph if it hurt you, I suppose I did not find your ideas lucid enough. Let me state it another way; while reading your blogs I was under the impression that I was reading the description of the symptoms of a problem, not the root causes of the problem itself. I'll give it another shot.

  • 13 months ago

    JimEBau

    Thank you for your two-cents worth (I would've rather done w/o it).  But, since you have brought up five questions/points, I will answer them as best I can.

    1. You need to get your facts straight.  I do not "long" for that type of government.  It's ALREADY in place via the Constitution.  There was no "failure" of the previous model.  It took 13 years of haggling with the Southern states before they could ratify the Constitution (Declaration =1776; Constitution = 1789), which is not in its original form, as the writers had to rewrite several swaths of it to account for slavery.  Jefferson and Franklin stridently warned that this blight would come back to haunt us, and it did; four score and seven years later.  You should read up on the Compact Theory and the 10th Amendment to the Constitution.  Also, reviewing my other blog posts will more than answer this question.
    2. I've clearly answered this question about elected office many times in my previous blog posts.  I suggest a careful review of what I've already written before you begin castigating.
    3. This question is perhaps the one that most ruffles my feathers.  I have offered MANY solutions and answers on how to deal with the current state of affairs in our country in my previous blogs.  'nuff said.
    4. I agree with the Electoral College, and have no desire to see it done away with.
    5. Our government was NEVER meant to be a duopoly.  It was intended to be pluralistic (a multi-partied system).  That's why I am a Constitutionalist; NOT a Republican or a Socialist Democrat.

    I must admit, I find I spend most, if not all, of my time answering questions in my blog posts from people who are NOT citizens of this country.  If you are a US citizen living abroad, then fly the flag of your country.  Since you are flying a Polish flag, and list your location as Warsaw, I assume you are Pole, not an American.  This is fine with me.  I love Polish people.  My heart goes out to them.  They suffered greatly under the cruel hand of the Nazi's (National Socialists...see, there's that word again), as well as the 'ins (Lenin, Stalin and the USSR...see, Socialists, AGAIN!@).  Also, I think that blonde Polish woman are the smokinest of all blondes.  But I digress...

    It is hard for me not to take some offense at the last paragraph of your post.  If you feel it is warranted, then that's your prerogative (at least here in my blog posts).  You don't know me, what I've been through, and, from the manner in which you've phrased your posts, it doesn't appear that it matters to you (although I'm willing to admit that I could, or either of us could, be misinterpreting what is being written).

    I made up my mind about what to do in the late 80's, and have been trying to make a difference ever since.  I have been a foster parent to 50-60 kids, all but three of which were long-term placements (2-3 years).  We adopted three of those kids then raised them as our own.  We home-schooled all our kids up to high-school, as the public school system here in America is one of the main contributors to the mess we are in.  I have run for city council in the city in which I live.  I have MANY answers and solutions to the problems we face here in my country.  However, not many people seem willing to listen, nor are they reasonable about dealing with any of the problems.  They have a fast-food mentality (I want it now, and I want it my way).

    Anyway, this is a blog post, and not a political campaign site, so, I will leave off here.  Hopefully, my wrists can get a rest now, as I do tire of writing... Smile

  • 13 months ago

    Crazychessplaya

    Okay, JimEBau, I re-read the Reese article, and some of your blogs. <sigh>

    Let me now address some of the issues you raised earlier and alse the Reese stuff.

    • You seem to long for a government that gives more power/independence or whatchamacallit to the individual states. But this decentralized model was tried between 1777 and 1789 under the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, and had to be replaced in 1789 by the current Constitution. What is the point of resurrecting a model which by trial turned out to be a failure?
    • Mr. Reese writes as if the "545 people" were in the office for life. They are not, everyone has to be made accountable for their doings in a reelection process, this is fairly obvious. So it is not like you are dealing with the exact same 545 people today, and the very same individuals ten years from now. Unless, of course, the voters unconditionally love the reps and the senators, which is clearly not the case.
    • You'd like to have more hands-on experience in making decisions for the country, I suppose. But nowhere in your blogs do I find a reference to, for example "constitutional initiatives" or referendums such as those implemented it Switzerland, which actually give the power to the voters to decide on specific laws. My point is, it is not enough to say "this is wrong", you should also propose a solution to the existing problem.
    • What are your views on the Electoral College? Do you want it abolished, and if so, what do you propose to replace it with?
    • Do you accept the current duopoly of the Democratic and Republican parties in the US politics? Again, I do not see a clear statement of what you'd like the target political system to be.

    Overall, I believe you have not made up your mind of what should be done. Or at least you failed to express it. In effect, your posts contain a lot of complaints, but no clear message of what is to be done with the problem. My two cents.

  • 13 months ago

    JimEBau

    Crazychessplaya:

    If you did indeed read the article, you'd get the point Charlie Reese is trying to make, and the point that I've been hammering for 20+ years.  Also, if you read some of my other blogs, you'd more fully understand where I'm coming from.

    You need to keep in mind how the U.S Federal government works.  I can only vote for the President and those Representatives in my district. I didn't "choose" those that are doing most of the damage.

    • I did NOT vote for Obama.
    • I voted FOR my Congressman, John Mica, who follows the Constitution in his voting.  He has always been an advocate for the Compact Theory.
    • I also voted FOR Marco Rubio, one of the two Senators from Florida, and an extremely Constitution-minded Senator.  He's for repealing many of the Amendments to the Constitution and starting all over.  Again, another person I voted for who believes in the Compact Theory.
    • I did NOT vote for Bill Nelson, who is the other Senator from Florida.  He is very much left of center, bordering on completely Socialist.  In his tenure as a Congressman over the past 25 years, both in the House and in the Senate, he has rarely voted for anything I would consider as proper legislation.  I can count on one hand the things he's voted for that I agreed with, and he only voted for them because of overwhelming public support for those issues.

    What's sad is that Bill Nelson was a Space Shuttle astronaut, and, like so many other famous Congressmen, who were either astronauts, or Vietnam veterans, or former pro-sports icons, seems to be more Socialist than Federalist.  The only notable Congressmen that I can think of that were very much adherants of the Constitution are J.C. Watts and Steve Largent.  Both were Congressman from Oklahoma, played football at OU, and in the NFL.  Go figure!

    I am one man, and while my vote is important to me, it has little impact on the overall scheme of things.  Again, I would direct you to some of my other blog posts to get a better understanding of why I posted this article in the first place, and why things are the way they are NOW here in these USofA.

    (BTW, did you happen to notice that the article was written over 25 years ago?)

  • 13 months ago

    Crazychessplaya

    The article by Mr. Reese is crap. The "545 human beings" were VOTED INTO their positions. They were not some accidental group that just made a power grab. You get exactly what you vote for. Quit blaming the people YOU chose to lead the country.

  • 13 months ago

    JimEBau

    Ah, you have understanding, but like myself, are in the minority.

  • 13 months ago

    RetGuvvie98

    nothing has changed - regarding culpability for the crimes against this country - except the names of the jerks in washington dc.

    they remain  - just as criminally responsible for the continuing mess they are making of this country - as the previous regime's people.

     

        The real question is:  Why do the people put up with such incompetence and why do we keep returning such people to positions of total authority over us ?

     

    is it that  > _____________________________________________________?

                                                 (fill in the blank)

Back to Top

Post your reply: