A dangerous passed pawn in center

Submitted by mauerblume on Sun, 10/11/2009 at 2:55am.

Please look at the following pawnstructure.

It is a very popular pawnstructure, which can come up from several openings. For example from the Semi-Tarrasch and Queen`s gambit accepted, but also from the Greenfield opening (with pawn on g6)

 

 

Normally it leads to a winning pawnendgame for black ( pawn chain f5, g6, h7 seems best)

 

 

Endgames in general would be in black`s favour cause of the outside passed pawn.

But before the endgame comes the middlegame. And here the center passed pawn on the d-file can become to a strong weapon.

Here a famous example:

 

 


Spasski managed to win this position with tactics around the d-pawn.

***

So what to do against such a strong weapon as a center passed pawn?

 

A) Try to stop it as soon as possible

 

 

This would have been black`s favourite position. The passed pawn would have been stopped a la Nimzowitsch very effectively by the knight and the queenside adventage soon would become evident

 

B) Try to eliminate it

 

» posted in mauerblume's Blog
 

Comments:

by percivalfox - 44 days ago
Horst Holstein Germany
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 197

ahah, the name of the opening IS Grünfeld, as it's named after a player called thus... but grün is german for green and feld is german for field xD... very creative, wallflower^^...

by SisyphusOfChess - 46 days ago
Brainsin International
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 188

"Greenfield"? is that a translation of Grünfeld?

by Frogerz - 47 days ago
Indonesia
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 29

immer ein beliebtes post !! ^^

by mauerblume - 48 days ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5537

This is correct . With a knight on c6 white would have compensation ! (Black would surely wish the pawn back on b7 :- ) )

***

Nevertheless white d-passed pawn should be stopped as soon as possible. And best through a knight

by cunctatorg - 48 days ago
Athens Greece
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 330

 It's hard for me to judge the A) position, the d6 blockader seems useful both in defense of f7, e4 and attack in the Q-side but I don't know if it has enough time for the attacking operations. "Changer les bloqueurs" seems out of the question but what about 1. Nd4 and 2. Nd4-c6, it's not a simple position...

 Let's see; 1. Nd4 Rfe8 (1... g6 2. Qxh6 Qc4 3. Qf4 or Qd2..., hhmm...) 2. Rxe8 Rxe8 and 3. Nf5?! Qc2!? 4. Rc1? Nxf5 -+... Did I miss too much?

by cunctatorg - 48 days ago
Athens Greece
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 330

 It seems to me that "Much Ado for nothing!"

 The name doesn't need to be translated but the translation is not harmful... And Grunfeld (Gruenfeld) Defense is a very fertile green field, too much fertile for amateurs like me... KID also is a jungle!! Not even to mention the city blocks of NID plus QID plus Catalan... I speak from the point of view of the second player of course. QGA and QGD are enormous city blocks also, maybe we have to reconsider Semi-Tarrasch! Chigorin Defense is interesting also but I would like very much to visit the Abrahams-Noteboom Slav... I don't like Bogo-Indian and I am afraid of Benonis and Old Indian... Green fields!...

 Nimzowitsch (as pointed out) presents a great deal of theory in "My System" about passed pawns (and blockade, blockaders and their functions, evaluation of blockade also) and then about even more complicated pawn structures as pawn chains and (in Part II) isolated pawns... His presentation is extremely useful and passed pawn positions are very rich in content, both strategical and tactical.

by dunce - 48 days ago
Iceland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 193

So if the name of the Grünfeld Defense needs to be translated to Greenfield, why don't you translate your own username, mauerblume, to Dead or Wilted Flowers?

Or we could just leave everything as is.

 

PS, good article.

by love_romance13 - 48 days ago
India India
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 168

gud artical

by mauerblume - 48 days ago
Duesseldorf Germany
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5537

The pawnstructure in the game was from  Semi- Tarrasch opening with 6.e4  Nxc3 7. bxc3

http://de.video.yahoo.com/watch/5835917/15272366

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarrasch_Defense#Semi-Tarrasch_variation

 

But with the pawn on g6 it could also come from

D80: Gruenfeld Defense

to be more exactly : from the Exchange variation in Gruenfeld Defense

( grün Feld is a German word and means translated green field :-) )

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr%C3%BCnfeld_Defence

by alansky - 48 days ago
baliuag, bulacan Philippines
Member Since: Oct 2009
Member Points: 16

Cool i always wanted to be good in handling my pawns,  my lost games were lost of time because i had hard time in analyzing pawn structure..  hope to get more tips!

by Winson - 49 days ago
Glasgow Scotland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 204

Nice blog. I have used centre pawns to gain tactical advantages like the way you said there. However, I know see how black should have responded early to the threat of the centre pawns. Thanks I feel I have learned something from this.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.