13300 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Below is a reproduction of his review of David Lawson's "Paul Morphy: The Pride and Sorrow of Chess."
I think so too, Lawdoginator. Everyone has certain biases that come out unintentionally even when guarded against.
Thank you, Czechman. Yep, a fellow Tarheel.
Snakehandler seems too interested in my proclivities :-D
Thanks, Grobzilla, but I'm more a lady-in-waiting that a Queen.
It's good to know an historian's biases in order to know what to trust and what to question about his work.
Batgirl, Thanks for all you do to bring us the history of chess and those who loved the game. You deserve a medal!
And you're a fellow Tarheel!
David Hooper seemed to carry a resentment for Morphy. Part of this might be due to the fact that Howard Staunton's deserved esteem and respect suffered through his interaction with Morphy and was overshadowed by the perhaps excessive regard for Morphy himself. Of course, Morphy being Morphy well deseved his fame which even Hooper could never deny, so Hooper seemed to shift his attention to Frederick Edge, Morphy's European chronicler. At any rate Hooper had always been very terse in his treatment of Morphy and very profuse in his treatment of Staunton - to a fault. The above review is just one example of Hooper's disdain for Edge. Hooper, who died 15 years ago at age 82 was a decent historian and master-level chess player. He's probably best known for his association with Ken Whyld in writing the "Oxford Companion to Chess."
Snakehandler may be interested in my Paul Morphy site where I spread the love considerably.
Batgirl is in love with Paul MMMMMMMMMMorphy...
You must be The Queen of Microfiche.
S B C NC, U.S.A.
View complete profile
Links: Paul Morphy A History of Blitz Articles about Women and Chess
The Queen of ChessPart IPart IIPart IIIPart IV
The Ladies' Chess Club of LondonThe First YearThe Early YearsThe Middle YearsLadies' Entry into the Chess World
Prince Dadian's Unknown GamesPt. IPt. IIPt. IIIPt. IVPt. VPt. VIPt. VII
The Childhood of Russian ChessPart IPart IIPart IIIPart IVPart V
Romantic ChessThe Dreaded CunninghamBertin Gambit: What Would You Give for an AttackVillemsom's Gambit in the KGAThe King's Gambit, Classically DeclinedKing's Gambit TalkPetrov's Defense in the King's GambitMuzio Madness Pt.IMuzio Madness Pt.IIMuzio Madness Pt.IIIMorphy's MuziosThe Bishops Gambit: pre-1900Eisenberg's Gambit
Develpment of Western ChessGioacchino Greco Philidor Deschapelles The Professor of ChessLouis-Charles Mahe de La BourdonnaisGeorge Walker -by HJR MurrayWilliam Lewis -by HJR MurrayHoward Staunton - by HJR MurrayParsloe's Coffee-House by MurrayMedieval Chess Stories by MurrayThe Courier Game by MurrayH.J.R. MurrayThe Ups and Downs of John Henry Huttmann
Opening ExplorerGame ExplorerGame Database
Terms Of ServiceSubmit a Ticket
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!